This document is the authoritative v1 map of the repositories owned by Definitely Secure Studio. It defines where work belongs, which boundaries must not be crossed, and the intended dependency direction. The governing decision is ADR 0003.
flowchart TB
studio["studio<br/>Public governance and brand"]
codex["codex<br/>Public stable specifications"]
lab["lab<br/>Public experiments"]
platform["platform<br/>Public production software"]
universe["universe<br/>Public reader-safe canon"]
lore["lore<br/>Private internal world-building"]
releases["Published releases<br/>Manifests, metadata, renditions"]
masters["Private asset storage<br/>High-resolution masters and sources"]
studio -. "policy and governance" .-> codex
studio -. "policy and governance" .-> lab
studio -. "policy and governance" .-> platform
studio -. "policy and governance" .-> universe
studio -. "policy and governance" .-> lore
lab -->|"promote stable contracts"| codex
lab -->|"promote proven implementations"| platform
codex -->|"versioned contracts"| platform
codex -->|"IDs and schemas"| universe
codex -->|"IDs and schemas"| lore
lore -->|"reviewed canon promotion only"| universe
universe -->|"versioned canon input"| platform
lore -->|"approved, minimal context export"| platform
platform -->|"release manifest and output"| releases
masters -->|"approved renditions"| releases
releases -->|"reader-safe record"| universe
Solid arrows show a movement of contracts, content, or artifacts. Dotted arrows show governance rather than a build dependency. An arrow does not authorize the consumer to copy or take ownership of the source material.
This is an ownership-level map. Exact tags, packages, artifact references, compatibility guarantees, pinning rules, and public/private provenance are defined by ADR 0006 and the cross-repository dependency strategy.
| Repository | Visibility | Single responsibility | Accountable owner | Contains | Explicitly excludes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
studio |
Public | Studio governance and public identity | Studio maintainers | Organization ADRs, roadmap, portfolio index, brand system, reusable governance policy | Runtime code, product specs, experiments, story canon, hidden lore |
codex |
Public | Stable, implementation-neutral contracts | Specification maintainers | RFCs, IDs, schemas, taxonomies, prompt contracts, manifest and context-package specifications, conformance fixtures | Production runtime code, exploratory prompts, story content, secrets |
lab |
Public | Disposable and exploratory creative-production R&D | Lab maintainers | Experimental agents, prompts, validators, prototypes, pipelines, synthetic fixtures, findings | Production services, authoritative specs, unpublished canon or lore, credentials |
platform |
Public | Production software that operates the Studio toolchain | Platform maintainers | Runtime and application code, orchestration, indexing, automation, integrations, tests, deploy configuration, software releases | Ownership of specs, canon, lore, brand source, embedded secrets or private context |
universe |
Public | Reader-safe creative canon and publication record | Canon editors | Universe bible, character and location canon, published comic metadata, story arcs, approved public assets and release records | Hidden continuity, unpublished twists, private communications, production software |
lore |
Private | Internal world-building and unrevealed continuity | Lore editors | Hidden timelines, internal company history, people, systems, communications, private context packages and unrevealed story material | Public governance, stable tooling contracts, production runtime code, the authoritative public canon record |
Visibility is part of the boundary, not the licensing decision. Public does not mean every file is open source: brand and creative assets retain their stated terms. The repository-by-repository classifications and operational rules are defined by ADR 0004 and the repository licensing policy.
| Content | Authoritative home | Boundary rule |
|---|---|---|
| Organization and topology ADRs | studio/adr/ |
Product-local implementation decisions stay with the product repository. |
| Product-local ADRs | The affected repository | Decisions spanning repositories are proposed and accepted in studio. |
| Experimental prompts and agents | lab |
Use synthetic or already-public fixtures only. |
| Stable prompt contracts | codex |
Contracts describe inputs and outputs; they do not contain proprietary story context. |
| Runtime prompt instances containing unrevealed context | lore or an approved secure runtime input |
Never commit them to lab, codex, or platform. |
| Schemas, IDs, taxonomies, manifest specifications | codex |
Consumers reference a version; they do not maintain forks as local truth. |
| Public canon and publication metadata | universe |
Only reader-safe, editorially approved facts enter this repository. |
| Hidden lore and unrevealed continuity | lore |
Promotion to universe is a reviewed copy of approved facts, not repository synchronization. |
| Brand source and approved brand exports | studio/assets/brand/ and studio/brand/ |
Product repositories may consume approved exports but do not redefine the brand. |
| Public story assets and web-ready comic renditions | universe |
Include only assets cleared for public distribution under their stated terms. |
| High-resolution masters and editable creative sources | Approved private asset storage outside the v1 Git repositories | Store immutable references and checksums in release manifests; do not force large or sensitive sources into Git. |
| Production code and deployable software artifacts | platform and its release registry |
Code must load creative inputs through documented contracts rather than own them. |
| Comic release manifests and reader-safe release records | universe |
The production pipeline emits them; canon editors approve them as the public record. |
- Authority is singular. A fact, contract, or implementation has one authoritative repository. Consumers may cache generated outputs but must say where they came from and must not edit them as local source.
- Public tooling remains content-neutral.
codex,lab, andplatformmust not contain unpublished plot details, private character history, private production context, credentials, or proprietary lore. Examples and tests use synthetic or already-public data. - Canon and lore are not mirrors.
universeis the public truth;loreis the private planning truth. Material moves from lore to canon only through an explicit editorial review, and later canon corrections do not automatically rewrite historical lore. - Specifications are not implementations.
codexowns stable contracts;platformimplements them.labmay explore either, but promoted work leaves the lab and adopts the receiving repository's change control. - Governance is not a package dependency. Repositories conform to decisions
in
studio, but builds and runtime operation must not depend on cloning it. - Private context is minimized. If production needs unrevealed material,
loreproduces the smallest approved context export.platformconsumes the export as an input and must not persist it in source, logs, fixtures, or build artifacts. - Generated artifacts identify provenance. Every cross-repository artifact records the complete stable reference tuple defined in the dependency strategy. Public records use an opaque attestation ID instead of private Lore details.
The following directions are the ownership-level summary. The authoritative artifact, pinning, compatibility, and release-order rules live in the cross-repository dependency strategy.
Allowed v1 dependency and promotion directions are:
lab -> codex experimental contract becomes a stable specification
lab -> platform proven prototype is reimplemented or promoted
codex -> platform production code implements versioned contracts
codex -> universe public canon uses shared IDs and schemas
codex -> lore private lore uses shared IDs and schemas
lore -> universe editors promote an approved reader-safe fact
universe -> platform runtime consumes a versioned canon input
lore -> platform runtime consumes a minimal approved private export
platform -> universe pipeline proposes public release records for approval
No repository may form a build-time circular dependency. In particular:
codexmust not depend onplatform,universe, orlorecontent;platformmust not vendoruniverseorloreas source code;universemust not require access toloreto build or publish its public materials; andstudiomust not become a shared-code or shared-schema repository.
The lore -> platform -> universe production flow is an artifact workflow, not
a cycle of repository ownership: platform consumes immutable inputs and emits
a proposed release record; universe owns editorial acceptance of that record.
Repository names under DefinitelySecureStudio use lowercase ASCII kebab-case:
^[a-z0-9]+(?:-[a-z0-9]+)*$
- Prefer a short concrete noun that names the repository's single
responsibility:
studio,codex,lab,platform,universe,lore. - Use a short qualifier only when the unqualified noun would be ambiguous, such
as
comic-rendererorasset-pipeline. - Do not prefix names with
definitely-secure-orstudio-; organization membership already supplies that context. - Do not encode implementation language, deployment environment, visibility, team name, or temporary status in the name.
- Do not use catch-all suffixes such as
misc,shared,common, orutils. - Reserve the public
.githubrepository for organization-wide community health defaults adopted by ADR 0005. Reserve the six v1 names for the responsibilities in this document. - Never reuse the name of an archived repository for a different responsibility.
A future repository is justified only when it has an independent responsibility, lifecycle, access boundary, or release cadence that cannot fit an existing owner. The architecture ADR must be amended before creating a repository that changes these boundaries.
Create the remaining repositories after this decision is merged:
codex, so all later repositories can point to the stable-contract owner.lab, to establish the experiment-to-specification promotion path.platform, to implement contracts without absorbing their ownership.universe, to establish the public canon source.loreas private, with access restricted before sensitive content is added.
Creating these repositories is tracked separately in issues #26 through #30. They should link back to this document and restate their local scope in their README.