I was building a similar quasi static solver and got stuck at why the calculated R per unit length value is less than what Polar Si9000e, Hyperlynx, ADS, or even Protoexpress (free online tool) gives. I get similar values like yours, and btw, if you solved the textbook structures (coaxial or twin pair), you will find your R value matching the equations. It seems commercial tools report a higher value for some reason, a value that's very similar to Rdc + Rac /// but no physical sense
I was building a similar quasi static solver and got stuck at why the calculated R per unit length value is less than what Polar Si9000e, Hyperlynx, ADS, or even Protoexpress (free online tool) gives. I get similar values like yours, and btw, if you solved the textbook structures (coaxial or twin pair), you will find your R value matching the equations. It seems commercial tools report a higher value for some reason, a value that's very similar to Rdc + Rac /// but no physical sense