You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 17, 2021. It is now read-only.
Add support for more complex types of data, such as lists of items (and being able to add, remove, etc.).
Perhaps add support for some sort of field groups (such as tuples or custom classes) which would allow for storing of groups of related data. This would be especially useful when paired with lists.
Having a toggle on variables to allow/prevent them from storing null may also be useful. Will require anything not marked as nullable to have a value (even if it is a reference type, unlike C#).
Will need to consider more cases such as how we would access variables/lists inside these 'groups'.
Add support for more complex types of data, such as lists of items (and being able to add, remove, etc.).
Perhaps add support for some sort of field groups (such as tuples or custom classes) which would allow for storing of groups of related data. This would be especially useful when paired with lists.
Having a toggle on variables to allow/prevent them from storing null may also be useful. Will require anything not marked as nullable to have a value (even if it is a reference type, unlike C#).
Will need to consider more cases such as how we would access variables/lists inside these 'groups'.