diff --git a/content/blog/broken-affiliate-link-monitor.md b/content/blog/broken-affiliate-link-monitor.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0d5d4f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/blog/broken-affiliate-link-monitor.md
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+---
+title: "Broken Affiliate Link Monitor: What It Is and Why One-Time Checks Aren't Enough"
+date: 2026-07-07
+author: "Carson Roell"
+tags: ["broken affiliate link monitor", "affiliate link monitoring", "link rot", "affiliate marketing", "automated monitoring"]
+category: "affiliate-marketing"
+seo_title: "Broken Affiliate Link Monitor: What It Is and Why You Need One"
+meta_description: "Most affiliate marketers check links occasionally. Almost none monitor them continuously. Here's the difference, why it matters, and what a broken affiliate link monitor actually does."
+---
+
+# Broken Affiliate Link Monitor: What It Is and Why One-Time Checks Aren't Enough
+
+Most affiliate marketers have audited their links at least once. They ran Screaming Frog, or clicked through a few pages manually, or used a browser extension that turned dead links red. Found some 404s. Fixed them. Moved on.
+
+Then six months later, a dozen new links broke. Quietly. While they were publishing new content, building backlinks, and doing everything else that builds an affiliate business.
+
+That's the problem with checking: it's a snapshot. The web keeps moving after you take it.
+
+A broken affiliate link monitor is different. It watches continuously, runs on a schedule, and tells you the moment something breaks — not when you remember to look.
+
+This post explains what that actually means, when you need it, and what to look for when you're evaluating tools.
+
+---
+
+## The Difference Between Checking and Monitoring
+
+A link checker answers one question at a point in time: *are these links working right now?*
+
+A link monitor answers a different question, continuously: *have any of these links changed status since we last looked?*
+
+The practical difference is the **discovery lag** — the time between a link breaking and you finding out about it. With manual checks or on-demand tools, that lag is however long it's been since your last audit. For most affiliate publishers, that's weeks to months.
+
+During that window, your content is still ranking. Still getting clicks. Still spending your SEO budget. It's just not earning.
+
+From the [June 2026 Link Rot Index](/blog/link-rot-index-june-2026): across 50 well-known affiliate sites, 6,550 outbound links checked, **5.8% were broken** — returning 4xx errors, 5xx server errors, or timing out entirely. These aren't small personal blogs. These are established, actively-maintained affiliate publishers. And they had hundreds of broken links live.
+
+The sites that caught these fast had monitoring. The sites that didn't? Some of those broken links had been dead for months.
+
+---
+
+## Why Affiliate Links Break So Fast
+
+This is worth understanding, because it shapes how you think about monitoring cadence.
+
+**Amazon ASINs turn over constantly.** Products go out of stock, get discontinued, or get relisted under new ASINs. Amazon's catalog is enormous and dynamic — a detailed review you wrote two years ago might be pointing to a product that no longer exists, or to an OOS page where the only action is "notify me when available." Your cookie fires. The commission doesn't.
+
+**Merchants change affiliate networks.** A brand that ran through ShareASale might move to Impact, or rebuild their own affiliate program. When they migrate, every link through the old tracking domain becomes a dead redirect — or a 404 — overnight.
+
+**Redirect chains collapse.** Many affiliate links go through multiple redirects: your cloaking layer → the network tracking URL → the merchant page. When any link in that chain breaks, the whole thing fails. These are especially hard to spot manually, because the first redirect might still return a 301 and look "alive" on a surface-level check.
+
+**Programs close without notice.** This one stings. You spent months building content around a particular offer. The merchant cancels their affiliate program. The links now go... somewhere. Maybe a generic homepage. Maybe a 404. Either way, no commission.
+
+None of these announce themselves. They just happen while your content keeps ranking and your readers keep clicking.
+
+---
+
+## When You Actually Need a Monitor
+
+A one-time checker is fine when you're just starting out, have a small site, and are auditing before a content push or site migration.
+
+You need continuous monitoring when:
+
+- **Your site has more than ~50 pages of affiliate content.** At that scale, manual checks take hours, happen infrequently, and miss the gaps in between.
+- **You've been publishing for more than a year.** Link rot compounds with age. A 2-year-old piece of content has links that have been exposed to 24+ months of merchant churn.
+- **Any meaningful portion of your revenue comes from Amazon.** Amazon Associates affiliates get hit hardest because Amazon's catalog changes faster than almost any other network.
+- **You manage more than one site.** Once you have a portfolio, the manual-check model breaks down completely. You can't audit five sites monthly by hand and also run a business.
+- **You've already found broken links once.** If you ran a manual audit and found issues, the question isn't whether there's a problem — it's how fast the problem is coming back.
+
+If none of these apply — you have 20 pages, you published them six months ago, and you audit them yourself every few weeks — you don't need a dedicated tool yet. A free link checker and a calendar reminder will serve you.
+
+---
+
+## What a Broken Affiliate Link Monitor Should Actually Do
+
+Not all tools that call themselves "monitors" do the same things. Here's what matters:
+
+**Scheduled, automatic scans.** The core function. You shouldn't have to initiate a scan — the tool should run on a fixed cadence (daily, weekly, hourly depending on tier) and report back. If it requires you to click "scan" each time, it's a checker, not a monitor.
+
+**Differentiated alert types.** A hard 404 (page gone) is different from a soft redirect (page exists but no longer has your tracking params) which is different from an Amazon OOS (product still exists, just not purchasable). Good tools distinguish these. They have different urgency levels and different fixes.
+
+**Handles cloaked/redirected links.** Most affiliate publishers cloak their links (`yoursite.com/go/merchant`). The monitor needs to follow the full redirect chain to verify the final destination — not just confirm that your cloaked URL returns a 200.
+
+**Email or Slack alerts when something breaks.** No dashboard is useful if you have to log in to see it. You want a push notification in whatever channel you actually check — email being the minimum.
+
+**Multi-site support if you have more than one property.** Having separate logins and separate dashboards per site is not multi-site support. A proper agency or portfolio view shows all sites in one place.
+
+**No WordPress lock-in.** If your stack isn't WordPress, you need a tool that crawls based on URLs and sitemaps — not one that requires a plugin install. This eliminates a meaningful chunk of the market.
+
+---
+
+## How LinkRescue Handles This
+
+LinkRescue runs scheduled scans against any site — WordPress, Next.js, Ghost, Webflow, headless, custom CMS, doesn't matter — and sends email alerts when links change status. The free tier scans one site weekly, up to 200 pages. Pro ($29/mo) scans daily with up to 2,000 pages. Agency ($79/mo) is hourly and built for multiple sites.
+
+The thing I'm most honest about: if you're a WordPress-only publisher who also wants internal linking suggestions, LinkWhisper is probably a better fit. If you run Amazon-heavy content and want ASIN-level tracking, AMZ Watcher goes deeper than we do on that specific use case.
+
+Where LinkRescue earns its keep is the broader case: multi-network affiliate sites, non-WordPress stacks, agencies managing multiple clients, and anyone who wants API or CLI access alongside the web dashboard.
+
+The free scan doesn't require an account. You can point it at any URL and get a real report. It's not a limited preview — it's the actual crawler. We use it as a distribution tool because the output tends to speak for itself.
+
+---
+
+## The Honest Bottom Line
+
+If you're earning real money from affiliate content, you have broken links live right now. That's not a guess — it's what the data consistently shows, across site sizes and niches and publishing ages.
+
+The fix isn't a comprehensive audit every quarter. That model keeps you perpetually behind. The fix is setting up scheduled monitoring once and letting it run.
+
+Free scan, no account required: [linkrescue.io/free-scan](https://linkrescue.io/free-scan). If nothing's broken, you'll know that in two minutes. If something is broken, you'll know that too — and you can decide what to do about it before another month passes.
+
+---
+
+*If you want the full context on how bad link rot actually is across the affiliate publishing world, the [June 2026 Link Rot Index](/blog/link-rot-index-june-2026) and the [25-site study](/blog/50-affiliate-sites-link-rot-study) both have the raw data.*
diff --git a/content/reddit-drafts/2026-07-07-reddit-drop.md b/content/reddit-drafts/2026-07-07-reddit-drop.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..04282f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/reddit-drafts/2026-07-07-reddit-drop.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+target: r/juststart
+date: 2026-07-07
+topic: broken affiliate link monitor / checking vs monitoring
+---
+
+**Most of us treat link audits as an event. They should be a process.**
+
+I've been looking at broken link data across a lot of affiliate sites lately. June scan: 50 well-known affiliate publishers, 6,550 outbound links checked, 5.8% broken. Not abandoned sites — actively maintained, ranking content.
+
+The pattern I keep seeing: people do one audit, fix what they find, then don't check again for 6-12 months. Meanwhile Amazon ASINs churn, merchants change networks, redirect chains collapse. By the time the next audit happens, a whole new batch of links is quietly returning 404s.
+
+The fix isn't a better spreadsheet or checking more often. It's scheduled monitoring that tells you the moment something breaks, not after you remember to look.
+
+If you're earning anything real from affiliate content, curious: how often are you actually checking your links?