I've come accross the paper from ACL's website (https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P16-1060/) which states that the traditional methods from conll2012 scripts are not so great methods to evaluate the coreference resolution task, and also introduce the LEA scorer (which has been implemented in this repository). However, the recent publications of this task are yet mainly evaluated by the old methods, and I can't see the reason why. Would be grateful for an appropriate answer.
Thanks :)
I've come accross the paper from ACL's website (https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P16-1060/) which states that the traditional methods from conll2012 scripts are not so great methods to evaluate the coreference resolution task, and also introduce the LEA scorer (which has been implemented in this repository). However, the recent publications of this task are yet mainly evaluated by the old methods, and I can't see the reason why. Would be grateful for an appropriate answer.
Thanks :)