Thank you very much for your code!
I noticed that the output formats of pep_patch_hydrophobic and pep_patch_electrostatic are not entirely consistent.
Could you please consider adding the corresponding patch information to the output of pep_patch_hydrophobic, similar to what is provided in pep_patch_electrostatic?
Specifically, it would be helpful to include:
type, area, value, main_residue, and residues,
where the value can be derived from the SAP calculation that is already supported.
Thank you very much for your code!
I noticed that the output formats of
pep_patch_hydrophobicandpep_patch_electrostaticare not entirely consistent.Could you please consider adding the corresponding patch information to the output of
pep_patch_hydrophobic, similar to what is provided inpep_patch_electrostatic?Specifically, it would be helpful to include:
type,area,value,main_residue, andresidues,where the
valuecan be derived from the SAP calculation that is already supported.