diff --git a/.changeset/sys-license-cloud-provided-registry.md b/.changeset/sys-license-cloud-provided-registry.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..f48b0df2ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.changeset/sys-license-cloud-provided-registry.md
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+---
+'@objectstack/spec': patch
+---
+
+`sys_license` is now registered in `CLOUD_PROVIDED_OBJECT_NAMES`
+(`@objectstack/spec/system`), so `isPlatformProvidedObjectName('sys_license')`
+returns `true` and a stack referencing it resolves instead of being flagged.
+
+The object is real and shipping: `@objectstack/service-tenant` declares it in
+the cloud repository (`packages/service-tenant/src/objects/sys-license.object.ts`),
+alongside `sys_package_installation` and the other four names already on the
+list. This repository has cited it repo-wide as the canonical
+`tenancy.enabled: false` example — the driver tenant-scope suites, the
+platform-global note on `ObjectSchema`, ADR-0066's worked example — while the
+registry omitted it, which is exactly the stale-entry failure the registry's
+maintenance contract warns about: consumers now trust the list, so a missing
+name turns a real cross-reference into a probable-typo warning
+(`object-reference-unregistered-platform`) rather than a resolved one.
+
+No accept-set change and no behaviour change for any name already on the list.
diff --git a/packages/spec/src/system/constants/platform-object-names.test.ts b/packages/spec/src/system/constants/platform-object-names.test.ts
index aa69771d57..c846699f44 100644
--- a/packages/spec/src/system/constants/platform-object-names.test.ts
+++ b/packages/spec/src/system/constants/platform-object-names.test.ts
@@ -153,4 +153,18 @@ describe('platform-object predicates', () => {
     expect(hasPlatformObjectPrefix('crm_lead')).toBe(false);
     expect(isPlatformProvidedObjectName('user')).toBe(false);
   });
+
+  it('resolves a cloud-provided object this repo never declares', () => {
+    // `sys_license` is declared by `@objectstack/service-tenant` in the cloud
+    // repo (`packages/service-tenant/src/objects/sys-license.object.ts`), and
+    // this repo cites it repo-wide as the canonical `tenancy.enabled: false`
+    // example — the driver tenant-scope suites, `object.zod.ts`'s
+    // platform-global note, ADR-0066's worked example. While it was absent
+    // from the registry those references read as fictional, so a
+    // cloud-targeted stack naming a real object was warned about a typo.
+    // Pinned by name rather than left to the loop above, so dropping it fails
+    // one readable assertion instead of nothing.
+    expect(isPlatformProvidedObjectName('sys_license')).toBe(true);
+    expect(CLOUD_PROVIDED_OBJECT_NAMES).toContain('sys_license');
+  });
 });
diff --git a/packages/spec/src/system/constants/platform-object-names.ts b/packages/spec/src/system/constants/platform-object-names.ts
index 2d9b29d2e2..6aff77525b 100644
--- a/packages/spec/src/system/constants/platform-object-names.ts
+++ b/packages/spec/src/system/constants/platform-object-names.ts
@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ export const CLOUD_PROVIDED_OBJECT_NAMES: readonly string[] = [
   'sys_app',
   'sys_environment',
   'sys_environment_member',
+  'sys_license',
   'sys_package',
   'sys_package_installation',
 ];