I noticed some skewed numbers in some of our projects for the CPU Quota. The calculations are factoring in 0/1 Completed pods as well as active running, I dont think that is the intent with these numbers.
Example CPU Quota Numbers
Namespace CPU Usage CPU Reqeusts CPU Req % CPU Limitis CPU Limits %
example-project | 0.01 | 2.70 | 0.25% | 108.00 | 0.01%
Requests/Limits Per Pod
Limits:
cpu: 2
memory: 3Gi
Requests:
cpu: 50m
memory: 256Mi
There was 1 Running 1/1 Pod, the other 53 were build pods that were in 0/1 Completed state
54x2 limit per pod = 108.00 CPU limits
It seems like these numbers should filter out Completed/Failed non-running pods in a project for accurate utilization reporting??
I noticed some skewed numbers in some of our projects for the CPU Quota. The calculations are factoring in 0/1 Completed pods as well as active running, I dont think that is the intent with these numbers.
Example CPU Quota Numbers
Namespace CPU Usage CPU Reqeusts CPU Req % CPU Limitis CPU Limits %
example-project | 0.01 | 2.70 | 0.25% | 108.00 | 0.01%
Requests/Limits Per Pod
Limits:
cpu: 2
memory: 3Gi
Requests:
cpu: 50m
memory: 256Mi
There was 1 Running 1/1 Pod, the other 53 were build pods that were in 0/1 Completed state
54x2 limit per pod = 108.00 CPU limits
It seems like these numbers should filter out Completed/Failed non-running pods in a project for accurate utilization reporting??