Hello, and thank you for releasing this work.
In the MalGraph paper, the CFG are extracted using IDA Pro and I would like to ask a clarification question.
Is it feasible to extract the same type of:
- control-flow graph (CFG)
- call graph
- function boundaries
using Ghidra, instead of IDA Pro?
- Does your pipeline depend on any IDA-specific metadata or heuristics that would make Ghidra incompatible?
- Have you (or others) tested Ghidra-generated CFGs with your model?
- Would replacing IDA with Ghidra primarily affect graph quality, feature consistency, or model robustness?
Hello, and thank you for releasing this work.
In the MalGraph paper, the CFG are extracted using IDA Pro and I would like to ask a clarification question.
Is it feasible to extract the same type of:
using Ghidra, instead of IDA Pro?