Skip to content

SC/MP cross: DLD/ILD/JMPs don't have E-displacement #16

Description

@sigurasg

It appears that a displacement of 0x80 for DLD/ILD/JMPs does not imply E-displacement, as is the case for LD et al. Instead these instructions simply have an extra byte of reach with the displacement, as -128 is a valid displacement.
In my opinion

   DLD E(P1)

should raise an error during assembly, as this is not a valid instruction.

See this thread on Vintage Radio.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions