Skip to content

Updated MIT License - #37

Merged
Dozgulbas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
new_license
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

Updated MIT License#37
Dozgulbas merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
new_license

Conversation

@AileenCleary

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@AileenCleary
AileenCleary requested a review from Dozgulbas August 4, 2026 12:34

@Dozgulbas Dozgulbas left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed: LICENSE-only change, no code touched. Pushed a follow-up commit stripping trailing whitespace so the trailing-whitespace pre-commit hook passes; license wording is unchanged. Approving.

@Dozgulbas
Dozgulbas merged commit 10e113d into main Aug 4, 2026
2 checks passed
@Dozgulbas
Dozgulbas deleted the new_license branch August 4, 2026 23:44
@Dozgulbas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Recording two license-text observations from reviewing this batch of 10 license PRs (@AileenCleary FYI — no action needed from you, these are questions for the template owner, not this PR):

1. Original copyright years are dropped. Each repo previously carried its own year — 2022 UChicago-Argonne, LLC, 2023 Self Driving Laboratories @ Argonne, 2024, 2025 — and all are now replaced with a flat © 2026, UChicago Argonne, LLC. Conventional practice is to preserve the range (e.g. © 2022–2026), since the copyright dates from first publication, not from the year the notice was reformatted. Six repos also shift attribution from "Self Driving Laboratories" to "UChicago Argonne, LLC".

2. Every repo is stamped Software Name: Modular Autonomous Discovery for Science (MADSci). That includes device-module repos (pf400, ot2, hidex, sciclops, biometra, a4s_sealer, brooks_xpeel, barty, hig_centrifuge, openarm). If any of these have their own Argonne software-disclosure record, the "Software Name" field may need to match the individually registered name rather than MADSci.

Both are worth a quick confirmation with whoever supplied the template (tech transfer / software release). Merged as-is since the wording was clearly handed down; happy to do a follow-up sweep if either needs correcting.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants