Skip to content

feat(automation): add DEV readiness policy evaluator - #4

Merged
syllik merged 22 commits into
mainfrom
sol/dev-readiness-dry-run
Sep 10, 2026
Merged

syllik merged 22 commits into
mainfrom
sol/dev-readiness-dry-run

Conversation

@syllik

@syllik syllik commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • add a pure read-only policy evaluator for future Project → DEV automation
  • encode repository integration branches: FE dev, BE develop, KB main
  • fail closed on missing/unreadable/ambiguous structured state
  • report reopened required work after DEV/PROD as INCONSISTENT
  • never propose a DEV transition for work already at DEV, PROD, or manual Done
  • treat a blocker as resolved when its issue is closed or its readable Project status is DEV, PROD, or Done
  • keep deployment and informational References outside DEV gating
  • add fixture scenarios plus focused unit tests
  • run tests on pull requests and by manual dispatch with only contents: read

Safety

This PR cannot mutate GitHub Projects, issues, fields, statuses, relationships, or PRs. It does not query live Project state and does not use a Project write token. PROD, Done, and parent closure remain manual.

Existing-tool research

Boardly was reviewed first. It supports Projects v2 dry-run and sub-issue gating, but does not model ChipIn's Development-linked PR checks against repository-specific integration branches or the post-DEV inconsistency rule without substantial customization, so this PR keeps the evaluator small and isolated.

Scope

This is the policy/evaluator layer only. A later PR will add a read-only GitHub adapter that feeds real issue/PR/Project state into this evaluator. No live Project mutation is part of this PR.

Human merge only.

syllik commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Verification update for current head 5028ac225e: fresh local node --test automation/*.test.mjs run passed 29/29 tests with 0 failures. Added regression coverage proving omitted readability flags fail closed as BLOCKED_UNKNOWN. actionlint is not installed in the current execution environment, so the workflow file was not actionlint-validated here.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 25af9196c3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread automation/dev-readiness.mjs
Comment thread automation/dev-readiness.mjs Outdated
@syllik syllik changed the title feat(automation): add DEV readiness dry-run feat(automation): add DEV readiness policy evaluator Sep 10, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c0e8d96a87

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread automation/dev-readiness.mjs

syllik commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 13df201fb3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread automation/dev-readiness.mjs

syllik commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: cf824fa15b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread automation/dev-readiness.mjs
Comment thread automation/dev-readiness.mjs Outdated

syllik commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Swish!

Reviewed commit: 7c15141a33

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@syllik
syllik merged commit 184a4b2 into main Sep 10, 2026
1 check passed
@syllik
syllik deleted the sol/dev-readiness-dry-run branch September 10, 2026 15:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant