release: authorize RC86 promotion - #30
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 62769e09e5
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| "runtimeApiValidated": true, | ||
| "webPresentationValidated": true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Supply exact-ROM runtime and web evidence
These per-ROM pass claims are not supported by the cited CI context: .github/workflows/ci.yml and its reusable packaged-android.yml workflow configure no ROM inputs, while the only source naming these five hashes, docs/reports/2026-08-13-base-first50-release-gate.json, records persistence results from a different evidence commit and contains no runtime-API or web-presentation outcomes. Because the promotion workflow merely trusts these booleans after confirming the ordinary CI run succeeded, dispatching RC86 would authorize promotion without the exact-control runtime/web validation required by the evidence schema; bind the record to a run that actually executes these five controls or remove the unsupported pass claims.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Summary
Verification
com.darkaxt.dualdex1.1.0-rc.86(1010086) with the pinned certificatevalidate-candidate-promotion.mjs🤖 Generated with Claude Code