Update Rust crate dd_sds to v0.1.0-20260813-972b5d8d1827

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change	Pending
dd_sds	workspace.dependencies	patch	=0.1.0-20260807-dd8be015454d → =0.1.0-20260813-972b5d8d1827	0.1.0-20260821-ffbe20ff0798 (+2)

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Europe/Paris)

• Branch creation
  • At 12:00 AM through 04:59 AM and 10:00 PM through 11:59 PM, Monday through Friday (* 0-4,22-23 * * 1-5)
  • Only on Sunday and Saturday (* * * * 0,6)
• Automerge
  • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[dd-prapprover-prod-77c48c]

PRApprover will approve and merge this PR, FAQ, #dx-source-code-management

🛠️ PRApproval Status

• ✅ PR is eligible for auto-approval by rule datadog-agent-renovate - 2026-08-21T18:04:02Z
• ⬜ CI tests passed
• ⬜ Approved
• Manual merge required: this rule does not auto-merge.

➡️ Current phase: CI tests failed. Please fix the failing tests and rerun the workflow, click Workflow Link -> Workflow Starter Link -> Start Workflow

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 93ba20627e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Regenerate the Bazel module lockfile

This changes the Cargo inputs consumed by deps/crates.MODULE.bazel, but MODULE.bazel.lock still records dd-sensitive-data-scanner_0.1.0-20260807-dd8be015454d and none of the newly resolved crates. Consequently, the bazel:mod-deps job in .gitlab/build/bazel/lint.yml will regenerate the module lockfile and fail at git diff --exit-code; commit the output of bazel mod deps with this bump.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Regenerate the Rust third-party license inventory

This update introduces tiktoken-rs plus bit-set, bit-vec, bstr, fancy-regex, and rustc-hash, but none are recorded in rust/LICENSE-3rdparty.csv. The lint_rust_licenses job runs dd-rust-license-tool ... check, which rejects an out-of-date inventory, so regenerate and commit the Rust license CSV with the dependency update.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[dd-octo-sts]

/merge

[gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351]

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-21 13:42:16 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

---

2026-08-21 13:42:23 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: Pull request is not mergeable yet

It will be processed automatically as soon as GitHub reports it as mergeable. View in MergeQueue UI.

• Run /code blockers to see what is blocking it.
• Run /remove to cancel it.

---

2026-08-21 17:51:05 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

[dd-octo-sts]

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 854ee32a:

Results for datadog-agent_7.84.0~devel.git.392.4031ca0.pipeline.132468359-1_amd64.deb:

Detected file changes:

1 Changed files:

• etc/datadog-agent/checks.d/libdatadog-agent-datasecurity.so:
  • Size changed: +48.31% (1.74 MiB) (3.61 MiB -> 5.35 MiB)

Results for datadog-iot-agent_7.84.0~devel.git.392.4031ca0.pipeline.132468359-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Job ID: 0958c7f7-7da2-48bd-af24-d6c166dcd1fe

Baseline: 05d20bc
Comparison: 4031ca0
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory utilization	+0.99	[+0.76, +1.21]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	memory utilization	+0.50	[+0.40, +0.59]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_idle	memory utilization	+0.13	[+0.07, +0.18]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_idle	memory utilization	+0.10	[+0.06, +0.14]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory utilization	+0.01	[-0.02, +0.05]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	memory utilization	-0.15	[-0.19, -0.12]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_private_action_runner	memory utilization	-0.60	[-0.73, -0.48]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_logs	% cpu utilization	-2.05	[-2.91, -1.20]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed	observed_value	links
✅	quality_gate_idle	intake_connections	10/10	4 = 4	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	memory_usage	10/10	172.70MiB ≤ 178MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle	total_bytes_received	10/10	746.63KiB ≤ 819.20KiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	intake_connections	10/10	4 = 4	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory_usage	10/10	522.67MiB ≤ 538MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	total_bytes_received	10/10	1.13MiB ≤ 1.25MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	intake_connections	10/10	16 ≤ 40	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	memory_usage	10/10	209.97MiB ≤ 229MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	total_bytes_received	10/10	263.06MiB ≤ 292MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	cpu_usage	10/10	360.41 ≤ 2000	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	intake_connections	10/10	18 ≤ 40	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	memory_usage	10/10	433.95MiB ≤ 453MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	missed_bytes	10/10	0B = 0B	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_metrics_logs	total_bytes_received	10/10	0.94GiB ≤ 1.04GiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_private_action_runner	memory_usage	10/10	72.06MiB ≤ 76MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_idle	cpu_usage	10/10	29.34 ≤ 100	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_idle	memory_usage	10/10	327.82MiB ≤ 335MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	cpu_usage	10/10	67.87 ≤ 200	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load	memory_usage	10/10	303.91MiB ≤ 314MiB	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	cpu_usage	10/10	23.77 ≤ 100	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_security_no_fs_load	memory_usage	10/10	315.79MiB ≤ 343MiB	bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

• ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
• ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
• ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_private_action_runner, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Static quality gates look suspicious

[dd-octo-sts]

Static quality checks

❌ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 854ee32
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job
SOME SIZE DELTAS ARE N/A (ANCESTOR METRICS NOT YET AVAILABLE). RETRY JOB

Error

	Quality gate	Change	Size (prev → curr → max)
❌	agent_rpm_arm64 (on disk)	N/A	N/A → 738.453 → 737.130
❌	agent_rpm_arm64_fips (on disk)	N/A	N/A → 694.533 → 693.820
❌	agent_suse_arm64 (on disk)	N/A	N/A → 738.453 → 737.130
❌	agent_suse_arm64_fips (on disk)	N/A	N/A → 694.533 → 693.820
❌	docker_agent_amd64 (on disk)	N/A	N/A → 821.177 → 820.140
❌	docker_agent_arm64 (on disk)	N/A	N/A → 822.123 → 820.890
❌	docker_agent_jmx_amd64 (on disk)	N/A	N/A → 1012.075 → 1010.900
❌	docker_agent_jmx_arm64 (on disk)	N/A	N/A → 1001.673 → 1000.570

Gate failure full details

Quality gate	Error type	Error message
agent_rpm_arm64	AbsoluteLimitExceeded	static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64 failed! Disk size 738.5 MB exceeds limit of 737.1 MB by 1.3 MB
agent_rpm_arm64_fips	AbsoluteLimitExceeded	static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64_fips failed! Disk size 694.5 MB exceeds limit of 693.8 MB by 730.1 KB
agent_suse_arm64	AbsoluteLimitExceeded	static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64 failed! Disk size 738.5 MB exceeds limit of 737.1 MB by 1.3 MB
agent_suse_arm64_fips	AbsoluteLimitExceeded	static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64_fips failed! Disk size 694.5 MB exceeds limit of 693.8 MB by 730.1 KB
docker_agent_amd64	AbsoluteLimitExceeded	static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 failed! Disk size 821.2 MB exceeds limit of 820.1 MB by 1.0 MB
docker_agent_arm64	AbsoluteLimitExceeded	static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 failed! Disk size 822.1 MB exceeds limit of 820.9 MB by 1.2 MB
docker_agent_jmx_amd64	AbsoluteLimitExceeded	static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 failed! Disk size 1012.1 MB exceeds limit of 1010.9 MB by 1.2 MB
docker_agent_jmx_arm64	AbsoluteLimitExceeded	static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 failed! Disk size 1001.7 MB exceeds limit of 1000.6 MB by 1.1 MB

Static quality gate failures prevent this PR from merging!
You can check the static quality gates runbooks page for guidance and tools. Please either fix the size violation or request an exception.

Successful checks

Info

	Quality gate	Change	Size (prev → curr → max)
✅	agent_deb_amd64	N/A	N/A → 762.563 → 764.600
✅	agent_deb_amd64_fips	N/A	N/A → 715.337 → 715.840
✅	agent_heroku_amd64	N/A	N/A → 314.532 → 319.080
✅	agent_msi	N/A	N/A → 647.624 → 661.050
✅	agent_rpm_amd64	N/A	N/A → 762.546 → 764.570
✅	agent_rpm_amd64_fips	N/A	N/A → 715.320 → 715.840
✅	agent_suse_amd64	N/A	N/A → 762.546 → 764.570
✅	agent_suse_amd64_fips	N/A	N/A → 715.320 → 715.840
✅	docker_cluster_agent_amd64	N/A	N/A → 211.344 → 212.130
✅	docker_cluster_agent_arm64	N/A	N/A → 224.395 → 225.220
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64	N/A	N/A → 7.443 → 8.400
✅	docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64	N/A	N/A → 6.877 → 7.110
✅	docker_dogstatsd_amd64	N/A	N/A → 39.463 → 40.440
✅	docker_dogstatsd_arm64	N/A	N/A → 37.560 → 38.580
✅	docker_host_profiler_amd64	N/A	N/A → 306.800 → 317.700
✅	docker_host_profiler_arm64	N/A	N/A → 318.046 → 328.970
✅	dogstatsd_deb_amd64	N/A	N/A → 30.204 → 31.210
✅	dogstatsd_deb_arm64	N/A	N/A → 28.240 → 29.590
✅	dogstatsd_rpm_amd64	N/A	N/A → 30.204 → 31.210
✅	dogstatsd_suse_amd64	N/A	N/A → 30.204 → 31.210
✅	iot_agent_deb_amd64	N/A	N/A → 46.503 → 47.550
✅	iot_agent_deb_arm64	N/A	N/A → 43.159 → 44.220
✅	iot_agent_deb_armhf	N/A	N/A → 43.950 → 45.020
✅	iot_agent_rpm_amd64	N/A	N/A → 46.503 → 47.550
✅	iot_agent_suse_amd64	N/A	N/A → 46.502 → 47.550