Skip to content

feat(chemistry-well-details): add new items from Mock-up #3 requirements - #1

Open
TylerAdamMartinez wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
story/bdms-1053-chemistry-display-mock-3
Open

feat(chemistry-well-details): add new items from Mock-up #3 requirements#1
TylerAdamMartinez wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
story/bdms-1053-chemistry-display-mock-3

Conversation

@TylerAdamMartinez

@TylerAdamMartinez TylerAdamMartinez commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Implemented the following:

* Remove the prominent single-event note from the multi-sample view
* Keep the sampling-event note as a table column or expandable row detail
* Keep parameter notes available for exceptions, such as an ORP measurement that did not stabilize.
* Add the Additional Analyses cross-tab.
* Update isotope labels to consistent delta notation, including superscript isotope numbers such as δ13C.
* Highlight exceeding values in red and bold.
* Remove detection limits and errors from the quick display.
* Add ion balance as a per-sample General Chemistry column.
* Remove ion balance as a note above the table.
* Create cross-tab for all views option
@TylerAdamMartinez TylerAdamMartinez self-assigned this Aug 20, 2026
@TylerAdamMartinez TylerAdamMartinez added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 20, 2026
@TylerAdamMartinez
TylerAdamMartinez marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2026 15:43
@lizalino

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@TylerAdamMartinez Looks good, there were only two acceptance critieria that I cannot confirm, 1. Inventory legacy chemistry parameters and initially order them by database order - I think this means what you created in the fourth tab, but please confirm. 2. Create cross-tab for all views - specific to parameters tab, but I don't see the difference between this version and the previous one. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants