Skip to content

Define execution provenance v1 (#69) - #9

Merged
andrewperis merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/issue-69-provenance
Sep 11, 2026
Merged

Define execution provenance v1 (#69)#9
andrewperis merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/issue-69-provenance

Conversation

@andrewperis

@andrewperis andrewperis commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Define the metadata-only Execution Provenance v1 candidate contract, RFC and classification-aware redaction policy.
  • Add synthetic valid/invalid fixtures and the constitutional conformance assessment.
  • Keep immutable contract publication gated on Studio issue #72.

Verification

  • Coordinated Platform suite: 74 tests pass.
  • Valid/invalid contract fixtures checked; generated validator is reproducible.

Coordination

Part of DefinitelySecureStudio/studio#69. Merge this contract PR before DefinitelySecureStudio/platform#12. Close the tracker only after both coordinated PRs merge.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-11T12:32:00.238524Z 6b6f192 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6b6f192c4e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread schemas/json/execution-provenance/v1/execution-provenance.schema.json Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant