Update documentation - #7151
Open
BlackYps wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThree ChangesDocumentation migration to published site
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
15-25: 🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick winUse descriptive link text instead of "here".
Line 17 uses the generic link text
[here], which is flagged by the linter (MD059). Consider using a more descriptive anchor like[complete changelog]or similar.-You can find the complete changelog [here](https://faforever.github.io/fa/changelog). +You can find the [complete changelog](https://faforever.github.io/fa/changelog).🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@README.md` around lines 15 - 25, The link text "here" in the Changelog section uses generic anchor text which violates the MD059 linting rule and reduces accessibility. Replace the generic link text "here" with more descriptive text that clearly indicates what the link points to, such as "complete changelog", ensuring the new text accurately describes the destination of the link while maintaining the same URL reference.Source: Linters/SAST tools
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/deployment.md`:
- Around line 127-129: The relative file paths in the "Related deployments"
section for the three workflow links (Unit DB, Spooky DB, and ETFreeman DB) are
incorrect and will not resolve properly. Update all three links by replacing the
incorrect `./workflows/` paths with the correct relative path
`../.github/workflows/`. Additionally, fix the double slash syntax error in the
Unit DB link (currently `./workflows//unitdb-update.yaml`) by correcting it to
use the proper path format. This will ensure the links correctly point to the
workflows directory located at `.github/workflows/` from the
`docs/deployment.md` file.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 15-25: The link text "here" in the Changelog section uses generic
anchor text which violates the MD059 linting rule and reduces accessibility.
Replace the generic link text "here" with more descriptive text that clearly
indicates what the link points to, such as "complete changelog", ensuring the
new text accurately describes the destination of the link while maintaining the
same URL reference.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: a5a9cad5-e6be-4dcb-903e-557faf8df22c
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.github/CHANGELOG.md.github/DEPLOYMENT.md.github/DEVELOPMENT.mdREADME-russian.mdREADME.mddocs/deployment.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- .github/DEVELOPMENT.md
- .github/DEPLOYMENT.md
- .github/CHANGELOG.md
BlackYps
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 27, 2026 12:45
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of the proposed changes
I got rid of the duplicate documentation documents to move towards the goal of always having just a single source of truth. I merged the info of both documents and updated it where it was outdated.
Testing done on the proposed changes
Not applicable
Additional context
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
.github