Document Application Integration credential access - #382
Open
carlospolop wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
integrations.authConfigs.getcredential-disclosure path and its Critical classificationintegrations.integrations.invokestored-credential workflow path and its conditional High classificationLive validation
Both paths were independently tested on 2026-09-08 in the authorized disposable
gcp-labs-ly3gvnn7project.For
integrations.authConfigs.get, a custom role contained only that permission. Before binding, profile GET and LIST returned 403. After binding, GET returned 200 with the exact synthetic bearer token while LIST remained 403, and projecttestIamPermissionsreturned only the get permission from the candidate set.For
integrations.integrations.invoke, projecttestIamPermissionsreturned only the invoke permission from the candidate set. Integration list/version GET, Secret Manager access, direct connector action execution, service-accountactAs, and token minting remained denied. The principal still invoked a deliberately published workflow; a controlled endpoint confirmed that its synthetic API key was attached without logging or returning the key.No real Workspace credential or data was used. Every created auth profile, connection, integration, IAM binding, custom role, service account, secret, Cloud Run resource, image, source artifact, service-agent grant, and temporary API enable was removed. A final audit found zero test resources and both APIs disabled.