Skip to content

docs: preserve archived Zen absorption provenance - #331

Open
KooshaPari wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
wip/hexa-kit-provenance-20260730
Open

docs: preserve archived Zen absorption provenance#331
KooshaPari wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
wip/hexa-kit-provenance-20260730

Conversation

@KooshaPari

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Preserves one archived Zen absorption provenance document. Validation passed after rebase onto current main. This is not a release or full-import claim.

…upersede)

Source: KooshaPari/zen (deprecated minimal template; GH-archived; cloned for audit 2026-07-28)
Target: HexaKit (46+ crates, Bifrost transport, governance tools per ADR-050/2026-06-20)
Diff: source (5 files, 0 code) vs target (full superset) = zen completely superseded
User decision: 2026-07-28 Y approval + 'proc w all nxt'
Docket: phenotype-registry/docs/absorption/zen/SUPERSEDES.md
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Snyk Security Scan Results

Snyk vulnerability scan completed. View results in GitHub Code Scanning dashboard.

1 similar comment
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Snyk Security Scan Results

Snyk vulnerability scan completed. View results in GitHub Code Scanning dashboard.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Caution

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub has been sunset. All code review activity has officially ceased.

Comment thread docs/absorption/zen/ARCHIVED-zen.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/absorption/zen/ARCHIVED-zen.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/absorption/zen/ARCHIVED-zen.md Outdated
@kilo-code-bot

kilo-code-bot Bot commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review Summary

Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge

Files Reviewed (1 file)
  • docs/absorption/zen/ARCHIVED-zen.md
Previous Review Summary (commit 917b9e6)

Current summary above is authoritative. Previous snapshots are kept for context only.

Previous review (commit 917b9e6)

Status: 3 Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge with notes

Overview

Severity Count
CRITICAL 0
WARNING 0
SUGGESTION 3
Issue Details (click to expand)

SUGGESTION

File Line Issue
docs/absorption/zen/ARCHIVED-zen.md 9 Inconsistent quoting — single quotes around 'functionality in HexaKit' instead of backticks used elsewhere for code references
docs/absorption/zen/ARCHIVED-zen.md 11 Target evidence table cell exceeds 120 characters, reducing readability
docs/absorption/zen/ARCHIVED-zen.md 28 Unclear abbreviation proc w\ all nxt in audit trail — not self-explanatory for future readers
Files Reviewed (1 file)
  • docs/absorption/zen/ARCHIVED-zen.md - 3 issues

Fix these issues in Kilo Cloud


Reviewed by laguna-s-2.1:free · Input: 143.2K · Output: 8.6K · Cached: 192.2K

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 917b9e63e5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/absorption/zen/ARCHIVED-zen.md Outdated
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Snyk Security Scan Results

Snyk vulnerability scan completed. View results in GitHub Code Scanning dashboard.

1 similar comment
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Snyk Security Scan Results

Snyk vulnerability scan completed. View results in GitHub Code Scanning dashboard.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant