Add CodeTour selection range support - #99
Open
jacklaplante wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
jacklaplante
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 3, 2026 14:12
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
selection.startandselection.enddomain fields.lineis omitted.Why
Microsoft's CodeTour format supports code selections, but the IntelliJ plugin currently navigates only to one line. This makes larger explanations hard to connect to their complete implementation and prevents portable VS Code tours from retaining their highlighted ranges.
Developer impact
Existing
file/linesteps behave as before. Tours can now use the standard one-based, end-exclusive shape:Creating a step while editor text is selected records the same structure automatically.
Validation
gradlew testgradlew buildPlugingradlew verifyPluginAll completed successfully with the project's configured Java 17 toolchain.
The revised plugin was also installed into Rider 2024.3 and verified against a mixed Unity/server repository: startup validation completed with 0 errors, including targets outside the Unity solution.
The Gradle publish-channel expression was also changed to an equivalent unambiguous
substringBefore('.')form because the original expression no longer compiles with the current Gradle Kotlin DSL.