Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

1 Commit

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Rowing Data Standard

An open, vendor-neutral standard for exchanging rowing session data between devices, apps and analysis platforms — built on Garmin FIT developer fields under a single registered namespace, covering both indoor and on-water rowing.


⚠️ Nothing here is definitive

This repository is a working draft, not a published standard. Everything in it is provisional and open to change:

Status
The specification text Draft v0.1 — not ratified
Field IDs, scales and units Proposed; may be renumbered or redefined
Compliance levels Proposed; the tier boundaries are still under discussion
Governance Undecided — a small named editorial team, an open-source project, or open participation with named editors. The group's first decision
Licensing Undecided — no licence is granted yet, see Licensing
Where this repository ultimately lives In progress — RITA adoption under active discussion, see Hosting

Do not build a shipping product against this text and expect it to hold. If you are implementing today, watch this repository for the first ratified release — a tagged release is a ratified version, main is not.

Nothing in this repository commits any company to adopting the standard, and no statement here should be read as an endorsement on behalf of any organisation.


What this standard is

  • A convention, not a new file format. It defines rowing-specific developer fields inside standard Garmin FIT files, under one registered application UUID (89e86158-6d47-5c98-9d46-7d29437f27b9) so that field IDs cannot collide between vendors. Any existing FIT reader keeps working; readers that know the standard get rowing detail.
  • Session data, recorded after the fact. The scope is the file a device or app writes when a session is finished — distance, stroke metrics, oarlock angles, in-stroke force curves. Everything a consumer needs to reconstruct and analyse a completed row.
  • Tiered, so partial support is still useful. Four compliance levels let a simple GPS watch and an instrumented racing shell both claim conformance at the depth they actually measure.

What it is not

  • Not a real-time or transmission protocol. How a device streams to a phone or display over Bluetooth or USB is explicitly out of scope. That is a harder problem with more commercial sensitivity, and mixing it in would stall the easy win. It may become separate future work; it is not this document.
  • Not a device certification or test programme. No badge, no audit, no fee.
  • Not owned by any single vendor. See below.

Repository layout

spec/FIT_STANDARD.md      The specification draft — the actual deliverable
registry/field-ids.md     Registry of every allocated developer field ID
proposals/                Substantive change proposals, one file each

How to take part

  1. Read spec/FIT_STANDARD.md.
  2. Open an issue for a question, an ambiguity, or an error in the text. Ambiguity is a defect: if you had to guess to implement something, so will everyone else, and two implementations will guess differently.
  3. Open a proposal instead for a new field, a changed type, scale or unit, or anything that could invalidate an existing file.
  4. Bring implementation experience. "We tried to write this field and our device can't produce it at that precision" is worth more than any amount of discussion. Real files and real constraints settle arguments — a change to the specification is not considered proven until it has been demonstrated in a working implementation, and a sample FIT file is the best evidence there is.

Participation is open. You do not need to be a company, a RITA member, or invited by anyone to file an issue or a proposal.

State your affiliation when you argue for something that favours it. Everyone here has a commercial position in rowing hardware or software — that is the point, not a problem. "Our device already does it this way" is a legitimate and often decisive argument; it just needs saying out loud.

Licensing

Unresolved, and it affects contributors. There is deliberately no LICENSE file yet: the v0.1 text originates with Sander Roosendaal, and relicensing someone's document is not a call the repository host makes quietly.

Until it is settled, nobody has a granted right to redistribute or translate the text, and no contributor licence is being asked for or granted. That is tolerable for a draft among participants and not tolerable for a published standard, so it needs deciding early. If it is a problem for you or your employer, say so on an issue and hold your contribution.

Hosting and neutrality

This repository sits under the MoveLab Studio GitHub organisation as a practical placeholder — it needed an address with issues, tags and releases faster than a new organisation could be agreed on. MoveLab does not own the standard, and hosting carries no editorial privilege.

The intent is to move it to a neutral home, and discussions with the Rowing Industry Trade Association (RITA) about adopting the standard are actively underway. RITA is the intended home.

The ask of RITA is deliberately minimal: lend the standard its name and host the discussion at its meetings. No budget, no secretariat and no administrative burden are being requested. Adoption remains a decision for RITA's members and board to take in their own time, and nothing here presumes the outcome or speaks on RITA's behalf.

Decide this before the first tagged release — implementers will start citing the URL, and moving it afterwards breaks links and citations.

Who is working on this

Listed as initial participants in getting the draft moving:

Sander Roosendaal Rowsandall — original author of the draft
Michael Naughton Nielsen-Kellerman
Tony Andrews CrewNerd
Joris Blaak MoveLab Studio — repository maintenance

This list describes who has been active so far, not a closed membership or an appointed committee. It is wrong the moment someone else shows up — corrections and additions by issue or pull request are welcome.

Prior art and acknowledgements

The draft builds on years of community work on rowing data, including from device manufacturers (Concept2, Nielsen-Kellerman, Quiske, RowPerfect) and software platforms (Intervals.icu, OpenRowingMonitor), and on the accumulated practice of the people who have been quietly parsing each other's files for a decade. Full acknowledgements are in Appendix B of the specification.

About

Open, vendor-neutral standard for rowing session data in Garmin FIT developer fields. Indoor and on-water. Working draft — nothing ratified.

Topics

Resources

Stars

1 star

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors