Skip to content

[CUG] Define browser-node restricted-domain support or fail-closed refusal #22

Description

@RobLe3

Problem

Rust, Python and TypeScript have explicit restricted trust-domain parity work, but the experimental browser node has no recorded disposition. Browser storage and relay constraints make silent partial support unsafe.

Desired result

Audit the browser node against the accepted restricted-domain Profile. Implement only a safe supported subset or reject required restricted-domain operation before network activity. Never persist long-lived membership credentials in localStorage.

Acceptance criteria

  • Supported and unsupported operating modes are explicit.
  • Required unsupported Profile semantics fail before discovery, relay or registration.
  • No public fallback occurs for private/local-only configuration.
  • Credentials and private topology do not enter browser storage or diagnostics.
  • Public experimental behavior remains regression-tested.
  • Documentation makes no CUG support claim without shared-fixture and black-box evidence.

Dependencies

Blocked by RobLe3/IICP#53 and the accepted shared configuration/fixture contract.

Non-goals

General browser credential management, GUI work, federation activation or changing public defaults.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or requestsecuritySecurity architecture or implementation

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions