ParticleEmitterHolder matching - #2022
Merged
ThatNintendoNerd merged 1 commit intoSep 8, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Report for RMGK01 (51ff189 - 9fa70fb)📈 Matched code: 71.56% (+0.02%, +1004 bytes) ✅ 8 new matches
|
ThatNintendoNerd
requested changes
Sep 6, 2026
CaptainProton42
force-pushed
the
ParticleEmitterHolder
branch
from
September 8, 2026 20:12
97c2194 to
9fa70fb
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've also changed the split to move
ParticleEmitter::isValid() constandParticleEmitter::isContinuousParticle() constinto theParticleResourceHolderTU to prevent them from being inlined inParticleEmitterHolder. These symbols are also unused inParticleResourceHolderso they are probably inlined there.