Skip to content

Experimental protocol + matrix runbook (#90) - #94

Merged
Santisoutoo merged 1 commit into
devfrom
feat/90-experimental-protocol
Jul 24, 2026
Merged

Experimental protocol + matrix runbook (#90)#94
Santisoutoo merged 1 commit into
devfrom
feat/90-experimental-protocol

Conversation

@Santisoutoo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Implements #90 (slice I of epic #20). Docs only — blocked on provider API keys for the real matrix, but the gap is fully specified so it runs letter-by-letter the day keys exist.

What

  • docs/fase5-metrica.md gains an Experimental protocol section: the ≥2 baselines (Claude + Gemini, both validated end-to-end), N=10 runs/cell with a power justification, the ablation axes expressed as existing harness levers (instructions profile per D-023/D-017, --sampling, tool-surface profile, QRH access) — zero new code — and what the aggregate vector reports (not just the scalar).
  • bench/README.md gains the runbook: the exact a320-bench run ... && a320-bench score runs/ --json commands the matrix executes, including Gemini's Vertex-express api_base passthrough via --sampling. Keys stay in the environment, never in a file or trajectory.

No CI/network dependency; score runs binding-free on a reviewer's machine.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_014JCrwRbtN7UA5ijn13vPmm

Slice I of epic #20, docs only (blocked on provider keys for the real
matrix): the metric doc gains an Experimental protocol section (>=2
models, N=10/cell power justification, ablation axes as existing levers —
instructions profile, sampling, tool surface, QRH access — and what the
vector reports), and bench/README.md gains the exact run+score runbook the
matrix executes. No new code: run records, score measures, the matrix is a
loop over the two. Keys stay in the environment, never in a trajectory.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014JCrwRbtN7UA5ijn13vPmm
@Santisoutoo
Santisoutoo merged commit 7cab16c into dev Jul 24, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant