chore: verify architectural manifest and prime-invariant definitions - #154
chore: verify architectural manifest and prime-invariant definitions#154TrueAlpha-spiral wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
- Verified that `architecture/manifest.mdx` correctly maps the core artifacts for all 4 phases. - Verified that `architecture/prime-invariant-a0.mdx` already explicitly locks in the definitions for Process Science and Computational Masonry. - Verified that Axiom P1/P0, Mungu Theory, and the paradigm shift from Behavioral Alignment to Structural Enforceability are fully formalized in `prime-invariant-a0.mdx`. - Checked documentation integrity via `mintlify broken-links`. No changes were necessary as the requested state already matched the repository state. Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
The user requested to formalize the documentation by creating an Architectural Manifest and explicitly drafting Phase 1 ('Prime Invariant Document A0') to lock in key definitions (Process Science, Computational Masonry, etc.).
During exploration, it was found that the exact requested content and structural mapping were already fully present and correct in
architecture/manifest.mdxandarchitecture/prime-invariant-a0.mdx. The definitions used the explicit "We hereby formally lock in..." phrasing as required by TAS standards.As no redundant edits were necessary, the task was completed by validating the existing structure and ensuring no regressions (via
mintlify broken-links). No files were modified.PR created automatically by Jules for task 12226193287400531411 started by @TrueAlpha-spiral