test(engine): add ordered list regression coverage

[coldworld22]

Summary

Add regression coverage for ordered list rendering when the list body starts with text followed by variables.

Changes

• Added an ordered-list counterpart to the existing issue draft() throws "Paths must be supplied" when {{#ulist}}/{{#olist}} contains direct variable references #145 regression tests.
• Reused the existing expectVariablesResolved helper.
• Verified ordered list generation and variable resolution.

Testing

• npm test -- TemplateMarkInterpreter

Notes

This PR only adds test coverage.
No production code, fixtures, or snapshots were changed.

[devanshi00]

Hey @coldworld22,
Thanks for adding the relevant test that allows two failure modes get equal test coverage across both list types, rather than leaving one combination (olist + leading text).
Consider parametrizing instead of duplicating. Tests 1/2 and (now) 3/4 are structurally identical pairs that differ only in ulist/olist and 'bullet'/'ordered'. A test.each([['ulist','bullet'], ['olist','ordered']])(...) would remove the duplication and make it structurally impossible for this kind of asymmetry. The next time someone adds a new failure-mode test, they'd add one parametrized case instead of remembering to write both variants.
It is just a suggestion for future maintainability.
We will still need a review from @mttrbrts before final merge.

[coldworld22]

Thanks @devanshi00 for the suggestion. I’ve updated the issue #145 regression tests to use test.each for the ulist/olist cases across both failure modes, so future additions only need one parametrized case.

[devanshi00]

Seems perfect for me!
@mttrbrts can you check this out ?