Skip to content

docs: state that the model is chosen once per run - #18

Merged
arasovic merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/skill-model-scope
Aug 15, 2026
Merged

docs: state that the model is chosen once per run#18
arasovic merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/skill-model-scope

Conversation

@arasovic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The bundled skill showed --model once in its command block but never said the
choice is run-level, while step 3 spoke of preserving "every explicit model" and
step 5 offered one to three workers. A reader combining those infers one model
per worker and writes --model twice, which the CLI rejects before anything
runs. The rejection is correct: Request.Model is a single string that
run.Controller hands to every worker. Showing the rule in an example is not
stating it.

Step 3 now states the scope and names the consequence a caller has to plan
around: two models mean two runs, and two runs that both declare writes cannot
overlap in one workspace. The concurrency rule itself is not repeated; it
already stands under ## Boundaries.

One line changed. The file stays at 52 lines, no numeric exit code was
introduced, and npm run verify passes.

The skill showed `--model` once in its command block but never said the
choice is run-level, while step 3 spoke of preserving "every explicit
model" and step 5 offered one to three workers. A reader combining those
infers one model per worker and writes `--model` twice, which the CLI
rejects before anything runs. The rejection is correct: `Request.Model`
is a single string that `run.Controller` hands to every worker.

Step 3 now states the scope and names the consequence a caller has to
plan around, that two models mean two runs and that two runs declaring
writes cannot overlap in one workspace. The concurrency rule itself is
not repeated; it already stands under Boundaries.
@arasovic
arasovic merged commit 8387b4c into main Aug 15, 2026
13 checks passed
@arasovic
arasovic deleted the docs/skill-model-scope branch August 15, 2026 22:44
@arasovic arasovic mentioned this pull request Aug 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant