Skip to content

fix: add missing v-prefix to schema URL versions - #487

Open
nirmalnr wants to merge 1 commit into
beckn:mainfrom
nirmalnr:fix/schema-url-standardization
Open

fix: add missing v-prefix to schema URL versions#487
nirmalnr wants to merge 1 commit into
beckn:mainfrom
nirmalnr:fix/schema-url-standardization

Conversation

@nirmalnr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • A number of schema.nfh.global references across devkits/, examples/, docs/, and specification/schema/ itself dropped the v prefix on the version segment (e.g. SettlementTerm/2.0 instead of SettlementTerm/v2.0).
  • This is inconsistent with the v-prefixed folder convention this repo already uses 100% of the time on disk, and in several cases inconsistent with correctly v-prefixed refs to the same schema sitting right next to the broken one in the same file/array (e.g. a Postman collection's schemaContext array mixing DemandFlexBuyOffer/v2.0 and SettlementTerm/2.0 side by side).
  • 656 occurrences fixed across 164 files. No content, structure, or non-URL text changed — every touched line only inserts the missing v.

Test plan

  • Automated before/after scan: plain-numeric version refs 656 → 0
  • Diff audit: every changed line contains schema.nfh.global — no unrelated content touched
  • JSON/YAML syntax validation passes on all 164 changed files
  • Spot-checked specification/schema/openadr/v3.1.0/README.md — the fixed URL now matches the actual openadr/v3.1.0 folder on disk

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

A number of schema.nfh.global references across devkits, examples, docs,
and the schema specification itself dropped the "v" prefix on the version
segment (e.g. SettlementTerm/2.0 instead of SettlementTerm/v2.0) -
inconsistent with the v-prefixed folder convention this repo already
uses 100% of the time on disk, and often inconsistent with correctly
v-prefixed refs to the same schema sitting right next to them in the
same file/array.

656 occurrences fixed across 164 files (devkits, examples, docs,
specification/schema). No content, structure, or non-URL text changed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant