Skip to content

GitHub issue template: Use issue types instead of labels - #1634

Draft
adombeck wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue-template-use-issue-types
Draft

GitHub issue template: Use issue types instead of labels#1634
adombeck wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue-template-use-issue-types

Conversation

@adombeck

@adombeck adombeck commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

GitHub introduced issue types in 2025. Since then, we have had two different ways to mark issues as bugs/features: The bug and feature labels and the issue types. Since we can't disable the issue types, let's use them instead of our labels.

GitHub introduced issue types in 2025. Since then, we have had two
different ways to mark issues as bugs/features: The labels and the issue
types. Since we can't disable the issue types, let's use them instead of
our labels.
@adombeck

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

let's wait for the result of the discussion I started in the Desktop team's MM channel

@adombeck
adombeck marked this pull request as draft June 26, 2026 11:47

@nooreldeenmansour nooreldeenmansour left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shall we update the README.md file to use type instead of labels?

authd/README.md

Lines 71 to 74 in d62e6b9

- To report an issue, please file a bug report against our repository, using the
[report an issue](https://github.com/canonical/authd/issues/new?assignees=&labels=bug&projects=&template=bug_report.yml&title=Issue%3A+) template.
- For suggestions and constructive feedback, report a feature request bug report, using the
[request a feature](https://github.com/canonical/authd/issues/new?assignees=&labels=feature&projects=&template=feature_request.yml&title=Feature%3A+) template.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants