Skip to content

[DOC-14148][AI] Add the missing 8.0.0 release note for MB-66015 - #4168

Draft
TimLFletcher wants to merge 1 commit into
release/8.0from
DOC-14148
Draft

TimLFletcher wants to merge 1 commit into
release/8.0from
DOC-14148

Conversation

@TimLFletcher

@TimLFletcher TimLFletcher commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes DOC-14148.

What changed

modules/release-notes/partials/docs-server-8.0.0-fixes-and-improvements.adoc, in Fixed Issues under Data Service.

*https://jira.issues.couchbase.com/browse/MB-66015/[MB-66015]*::

Subdoc get operations are now correctly permitted against locked documents.
This is a change in behaviour: the operation now returns `SUCCESS`, where previously it returned `LOCKED`.
The CAS is set to a special locked value, encoded as all ones (`0xffff_ffff_ffff_ffff`).

Placed between MB-65779 and MB-67106, since entries in each section run in ascending MB order.

Sources

Claim Source
Subdoc lookups are now permitted on locked documents, changed in 8.0.0 by MB-66015 Ticket, from @daniel Owen
Returns SUCCESS where it previously returned LOCKED Ticket
CAS set to all ones, 0xffff_ffff_ffff_ffff Ticket

MB-66015 appears nowhere else in the repository, so this was genuinely missing rather than recorded elsewhere.

Wording

The ticket supplies the note as prose to drop in. I split it across three lines to match the one-sentence-per-line style of the surrounding entries, and dropped the "MB-66015:" prefix because the entry's term already carries the link. Substance is unchanged.

Verification

PASS[docs-server @ DOC-14148 vs baseline release/8.0]: no new build diagnostics.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The 8.0.0 behaviour change permitting subdoc get operations against locked
documents was never recorded. Added to Fixed Issues under Data Service, in
MB number order.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant