docs(conformance): the expected-red manifest of the ERA cut, from its board

[cryptskii]

What

The expected-red manifest of the ERA cut (#1016), recorded from its board into CONFORMANCE_GAPS.md §6.32 — the plan's rule for the last commit of the sweep: every test the ERA hole turns red is listed by name, so from here a board is judged against the list (a red outside it is a regression; a listed test that goes green without ERA's policy is a finding). #1016 merged before this could ride on it, so it lands on its own.

The list

The Rust tests (dsm_sdk) job of 97d6d5561 (run 36226702605): 1020 tests, 46 failed. 45 fail on the ERA refusal — "Token policy violation for NW9MKEFNZ6GTD8209QN3DQ6996DWP9E9NQ0H5DYCKA9WNS0Z69H0: no policy is committed at the commitment the operation names" — at an ERA transfer or burn (each failing test's panic was read from the job log; the four whose message was the wallet.send wrapper of that refusal and the one whose assertion follows a refused ERA send were checked against their bodies). Every other job of the board was green. The 46th, sdk::sofi_reads::tests::an_unestablished_genesis_candidate_is_not_read_as_unpublished, was main's pre-existing red (#1013), fixed by #1017, and is named as not in the manifest.

Docs only; no code. ci/conformance_evidence.py → clean (the list names tests that exist).