Skip to content

Put researched populations and prices on the Answer line - #51

Merged
devbadya merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/research-answer-figures-f666
Sep 10, 2026
Merged

Put researched populations and prices on the Answer line#51
devbadya merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/research-answer-figures-f666

Conversation

@devbadya

@devbadya devbadya commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

A 0.8B model invents populations and prices to three significant digits. research already opened the digest with Answer: Friedrich Merz. when the passages named a person. A question that asked for a number still left the model to extract 13.96 million from the quotes.

The same extractor now handles figures, and only when the question asked for one.

When the digest opens with a figure

  • Two sources give the same reading, including ordinary rounding (13.96 million and 14 million)
  • Or one sentence states it (Berlin hat 3,8 Millionen Einwohner, A Big Mac costs 450 yen)

When it stays off

  • The question was not asking for a number — names still win Wer ist der Bundeskanzler?
  • The only candidate is the city on a population question
  • Two figures that are not the same reading (14 million vs 11 million)
  • A year sitting next to the figure (as of 2024)

The research-question skill has a Tokyo-population exemplar so the model is shown a number on the first line.

pnpm check is green (1,311 tests). Generation was not run: this VM has no GPU adapter, which the hosted landing page reports correctly.

Jarvis open in Chrome

To show artifacts inline, enable in settings.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

A 0.8B model invents these figures to three significant digits. When
the question asked for a number and the passages agree — or one
sentence states 13.96 million people or 450 yen — the digest now
opens with that, the same way it already opens with Friedrich Merz.
A city name is not an answer to how many people live there.

Co-authored-by: Sebastian <devbadya@users.noreply.github.com>
@devbadya
devbadya marked this pull request as ready for review September 9, 2026 21:50
@devbadya
devbadya merged commit 0018939 into main Sep 10, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants