remove operations from examples - #760
Merged
masc2023 merged 1 commit intoAug 5, 2026
Merged
Conversation
RolandJentschETAS
requested review from
PandaeDo,
aschemmel-tech,
masc2023 and
pahmann
as code owners
August 5, 2026 13:44
masc2023
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2026
|
The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request updates the traceability guidance in the architecture process requirements documentation to simplify and clarify the mapping between requirements and architecture elements.
Documentation update:
Traceability to Requirements and AoUsection by removing the_opsuffix from architecture element identifiers, making the mappings easier to read and understand. (process/process_areas/architecture_design/guidance/architecture_process_reqs.rst)