Skip to content

Brem rules score tutorial feedback - #376

Draft
bemerybmw wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
brem_rules_score_tutorial_feedback
Draft

Brem rules score tutorial feedback#376
bemerybmw wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
brem_rules_score_tutorial_feedback

Conversation

@bemerybmw

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Report

Coverage report was generated.

Full report can be downloaded from the CI artifacts (expand Artifacts at the bottom of the run).

Overall coverage rate:

lines......: 86.2%
functions......: 52.2%


Once the architecture is in place, the build parses the PlantUML diagram and validates it against the Bazel model. It verifies element names, structural hierarchy, and consistency between the declared diagram and the implemented architecture.

How is this verification done? i.e. what build / test target?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dependable element

bazel targets exposes via a marco already a test target, which can be run via e.g.:
``bazel test //:assumed_system_requirements_test``.

Why does it specify a relative path here? In the Build part it mentions building from the root, I think this distinction should be mentioned here (and saying to run the command from bazel/rules/rules_score/examples/minimal directory). Building from root or from the minimal directory seems to cause an issue with include paths? If building with full path, the include should be

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added comment, is a separate Bazel Module and should be run from example path

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants