Writing Paper (JOSS) - #188
Draft
JensKrumsieck wants to merge 45 commits into
Draft
Conversation
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
JensKrumsieck
force-pushed
the
paper/joss
branch
from
October 29, 2025 08:09
95129f5 to
8f2df5b
Compare
JensKrumsieck
force-pushed
the
paper/joss
branch
from
October 29, 2025 13:26
a49272c to
fddd88d
Compare
Member
Author
|
This has fallen behind somehow. |
Member
Author
Software design section may needs some work being done, some references are missing, affil 5 not valid
|
|
||
| # Research impact statement | ||
| SciWIn-Client adresses a critical gap in open and reproducible science: The gap between the complexicty of formal workflow standards and the practical capabilities of reserachers. By automating CWL generation directly from command-line interactions, it enables scientists, regardless of their software engineering background, to produce structured, version-controlled, and portable workflow definitions without manual authoring of verbose specifications. | ||
| Within the FAIRagro-consortium[@Ewert2023Proposal], SciWIn-Client directly supports the FAIR principles for data by ensuring that computational processes in agricultural research are FAIR compliant by using a defined standard. Workflows produced by SciWIn-Client are natively compatible with the ARC format [@dataplant2025ARCSpec; @Weil2023PLANTdataHUB], enabling seamless integration with DataPLANT's research data management infrastructure, and can be exported as Workflow Run RO-Crates [@Leo2024WRRC], providing machine-readable provenance records for every execution. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"SciWIn-Client directly supports the FAIR principles for data by ensuring that computational processes in
agricultural research are FAIR compliant" can be motivated more strongly by emphasizing how SciWIn helps converting god scripts/script collections into reproducible workflows with ease instead. "using a defined standard" seems more like a plus, but not the main argument.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Commit and/or merge changes to the paper to this branch
Invite people for proof read if their products products: Middleware, Search, ARCs, ... are mentioned in a way we need an approval.
When draft is ready spread into TA4 at least BEFORE publishing!
This PR is used for communication and CI Builds, it may never will be merged to master!