Skip to content

docs: convert product review feedback into a tracked action plan - #8

Closed
smusali wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/checkowners-product-feedback-ic53o9
Closed

docs: convert product review feedback into a tracked action plan#8
smusali wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/checkowners-product-feedback-ic53o9

Conversation

@smusali

@smusali smusali commented Jul 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Adds docs/PRODUCT_ACTION_PLAN.md, which converts the external "brutal review" of checkOwners into a fully actionable, codebase-grounded plan. This is a documentation-only change — no code is modified.

The document breaks the feedback into:

  • Baseline scores from the review and the guiding constraints it prescribes (one target user, one urgent job, one primary output, one distribution path, one proof asset, one trust promise; observed vs. recommended vs. declared vs. approved ownership vocabulary).
  • 14 workstreams (A–N), each feedback point converted into a tracked step with an ID, the exact files it touches (e.g. README.md:9/README.md:11 positioning edits, new checkowners/audit.py, explain in expertise.py/cli.py, doctor, stable exit codes across cli.py, action.yml least-privilege/audit-mode split, SARIF, protected paths through config.py/models.py, state schema bump in state.py), and acceptance criteria:
    • A: positioning and README rewrite
    • B: checkowners audit as the default first-run path
    • C: explainability, uncertainty labels, and false-positive honesty
    • D: safe, reviewable CODEOWNERS changes (diff-first, no silent modification)
    • E: scoring and configuration controls
    • F: team ownership modes
    • G: owner-validity checks
    • H: GitHub Action conversion
    • I: CLI/installation gaps, doctor, stable exit codes
    • J: documentation priorities
    • K: evaluation, metrics, and accept/reject/correct feedback loop
    • L: the public case study
    • M: the 10–15-session validation plan
    • N: explicit de-prioritization policy for platform features
  • Roadmap mapping the review's P0/P1/P2 lists to the step IDs, plus success metrics defining when the pivot is done.

Notes

  • The plan documents the feedback; it intentionally implements none of it, so each workstream can be picked up as its own PR.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_0176E2yMicwEB1hSrk1p7sDa


Generated by Claude Code

Convert the external product review into a tracked action plan
(docs/PRODUCT_ACTION_PLAN.md): 14 workstreams with step IDs, target
files, and acceptance criteria, sequenced by the review's P0/P1/P2
priorities, plus guiding constraints, success metrics, and an explicit
de-prioritization policy.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0176E2yMicwEB1hSrk1p7sDa
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants