docs(gov): fix proposer field comment - #534
Conversation
Signed-off-by: zloglevel <loglevel@outlook.com>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remains after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe change corrects a spelling error in the comment above the ChangesGovernance comment correction
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This PR corrects a documentation typo in the proposer field without changing runtime behavior, APIs, or wire format. No actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review. Suggested reviewers: Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.) ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Correct “proposal sumbitter” to “proposal submitter” in the
Proposal.proposerprotobuf comment. This improves generated documentation without changing the schema or wire format.Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...