Skip to content

docs: reconcile weekly backlog and module audit for September 7 - #313

Merged
kyleve merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/weekly-todo-triage-2026-09-07
Sep 7, 2026
Merged

docs: reconcile weekly backlog and module audit for September 7#313
kyleve merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/weekly-todo-triage-2026-09-07

Conversation

@kyleve

@kyleve kyleve commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Posted by an AI agent on kve's behalf.

Summary

  • Reconcile all 12 area backlogs with source through PR Stamp welcome cards in, fade the scrim, and add a debug reset #311 (5f65b9f0), including PR feat(WhereUI): welcome users to their live region #309 that the previous report's stated source coverage missed. The inbox is empty.
  • Archive three entries: shipped logged-in/out scope modeling, shipped local ingest/manual-sample fan-out, and the corrected WhereCore documentation cluster. Keep the summary, picker, and other partially implemented work open.
  • File two welcome follow-ups: foreground lookup refresh and scrolling/modal snapshot coverage. Narrow the current-location marker request to what remains after the welcome feature.
  • Correct overstated failure claims, moved citations, test/reference counts, and snapshot backlog formatting. Document actual reconciliation and snapshot-model-sharing limitations.
  • Refresh MODULE_AUDIT.md with the commit boundary, module checks, and a derived inventory: 709 source files, 371 test/support files, 49 image-suite files, 495 references, and 25 test bundles.

Review focus

  • The welcome foreground finding follows from the retained view's unchanged task key; its entry explicitly calls for a device reproduction before choosing the final trigger. No runtime fix is claimed here.
  • Snapshot model sharing remains open even though its misleading documentation is corrected. Priorities are preserved.
  • The September 9 benchmark-plan downgrade remains a saved deadline, not freshly verified billing state. The benchmark repository still exists and is not archived.

Verification

  • ./swiftformat --lint — passed; 0/1,136 files require formatting, 125 skipped. The sandbox initially prevented writing the optional formatter cache; lint itself passed.
  • ./shellcheck — passed.
  • ./attribution --check — passed; 12 credits current.
  • ./snapshot-shards check — passed; 49 suites assigned 13/15/18 plus 3 intake.
  • ./sync-agents — passed after instruction changes; generated files remain ignored.
  • git diff --check — passed. Both Swift diffs contain comments only.
  • ./test, architecture execution, simulator/image suites, and retained Python/Ruby suites were skipped: this change contains Markdown and comments only, with no executable, reference-image, matrix, or rendered-copy changes. No fresh visual or live-motion validation is claimed. The automation's Linux/static-analysis limitations are preserved; this run used macOS host checks.

Archive shipped scope and local fan-out work plus the corrected WhereCore documentation cluster. File welcome foreground and snapshot coverage follow-ups, narrow partial requests, correct stale evidence, and disclose snapshot model sharing.

Validation: SwiftFormat, ShellCheck, attribution, snapshot-shard validation, agent sync, and git diff --check pass. Swift diffs are comments only; simulator, architecture, and retained-tool suites skipped because no executable behavior changed.
Record the precise covered source boundary, both welcome PRs, per-module static checks, inventory changes, supported check results, and runtime/Linux limitations. The report contains pointers to durable backlog items rather than duplicate work lists.
@kyleve kyleve added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 7, 2026
@kyleve
kyleve merged commit c62c1af into main Sep 7, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant