Skip to content

Proposal: Jneopallium (Sandbox) - #107

Open
rakovpublic wants to merge 1 commit into
lfai:masterfrom
rakovpublic:proposal/jneopallium
Open

Proposal: Jneopallium (Sandbox)#107
rakovpublic wants to merge 1 commit into
lfai:masterfrom
rakovpublic:proposal/jneopallium

Conversation

@rakovpublic

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Jneopallium is a Java framework for modelling natural neuron networks at a user-chosen level of biological detail, plus a safety-gated bridge framework for connecting those networks to real industrial, clinical, aerial and grid equipment.

Requesting Sandbox. The codebase is mature — started 2018, 47 Maven modules, ~1,600 source files — but the community is one maintainer and 8 stars, so Sandbox is the honest entry point. Hosting is being sought precisely to build the multi-organization contributor base that Incubation requires.

The proposal answers every question in the template, and states the gaps plainly rather than papering over them: no member sponsor secured yet, one contributor, no OpenSSF badge registered, and the repository still under the founder's personal account rather than its own org.

Governance groundwork is done rather than promised — GOVERNANCE.md, MAINTAINERS.md, RELEASES.md, SUPPORT.md, CODEOWNERS, a rewritten SECURITY.md with a real disclosure process, and DCO sign-off enforced in CI are all in the repository today. The governance model is written so its single-maintainer clauses expire automatically once more maintainers exist.

Appendix B tracks the proposal against §2 of the Project Lifecycle document item by item.

Jneopallium is a Java framework for modelling natural neuron networks at
a user-chosen level of biological detail, plus a safety-gated bridge
framework for connecting those networks to real industrial, clinical,
aerial and grid equipment.

Requesting Sandbox. The codebase is mature — started 2018, 47 Maven
modules, ~1,600 source files — but the community is one maintainer and
8 stars, so Sandbox is the honest entry point. Hosting is being sought
precisely to build the multi-organization contributor base that
Incubation requires.

The proposal answers every question in the template, and states the
gaps plainly rather than papering over them: no member sponsor secured
yet, one contributor, no OpenSSF badge registered, and the repository
still under the founder's personal account rather than its own org.

Governance groundwork is done rather than promised — GOVERNANCE.md,
MAINTAINERS.md, RELEASES.md, SUPPORT.md, CODEOWNERS, a rewritten
SECURITY.md with a real disclosure process, and DCO sign-off enforced
in CI are all in the repository today. The governance model is written
so its single-maintainer clauses expire automatically once more
maintainers exist.

Appendix B tracks the proposal against §2 of the Project Lifecycle
document item by item.

Signed-off-by: Dmytro Rakovskyi <rakovpublic@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant