Skip to content

chore: probe CodeQL behaviour on fork PRs - #636

Draft
Kateřina Churanová (kate-shine) wants to merge 1 commit into
microsoft:mainfrom
kate-shine:kchuranov/codeql-fork-probe
Draft

chore: probe CodeQL behaviour on fork PRs#636
Kateřina Churanová (kate-shine) wants to merge 1 commit into
microsoft:mainfrom
kate-shine:kchuranov/codeql-fork-probe

Conversation

@kate-shine

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Purpose

Throwaway probe, do not merge. Empty commit, no file changes.

This is a fork PR (head is kate-shine/oxidizer). It exists to verify one thing:

now that .github/workflows/codeql.yml has been re-enabled, does a pull request from a fork get a CodeQL code scanning check?

Until now, fork PRs got no CodeQL run and no CodeQL check at all, so the code-scanning merge-protection rule blocked them forever. See #624 and #633 for the full analysis.

Note that CodeQL default setup is still enabled, so this also shows whether the two setups coexist or produce duplicate checks.

Will be closed once the checks have reported.

Related: #633

Empty commit. Verifies that the re-enabled advanced CodeQL workflow
reports a code scanning check for pull requests from forks.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 4, 2026 09:30

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.0%. Comparing base (00443db) to head (49bc3c2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #636   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   100.0%   100.0%           
=======================================
  Files         473      473           
  Lines       45493    45493           
=======================================
  Hits        45493    45493           
Flag Coverage Δ
linux ?
linux-arm ?
scheduled ?
windows ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@martin-kolinek
martin-kolinek marked this pull request as draft August 4, 2026 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants