Skip to content

[ci] E: Update Nanvix SDK - #838

Merged
ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v3.12.3from
automation/update-nanvix-version
Jul 30, 2026
Merged

[ci] E: Update Nanvix SDK#838
ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v3.12.3from
automation/update-nanvix-version

Conversation

@ppenna

@ppenna ppenna commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Automated coherent update to verified Nanvix SDK v0.21.53-sdk.1. The manifest and lockfile were generated atomically by the target zutils implementation.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 30, 2026 15:17

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the Nanvix integration metadata to use the newer, verified Nanvix SDK release v0.21.53-sdk.1, keeping the manifest and generated lockfile in sync for the Nanvix build/toolchain flow under .nanvix/.

Changes:

  • Bump nanvix-version and sdk-version in .nanvix/nanvix.toml to 0.21.53 / v0.21.53-sdk.1, including the updated SDK image digest.
  • Regenerate .nanvix/nanvix.lock to reflect the new manifest hash and updated resolved SDK/sysroot/dependency asset references for 0.21.53.
Show a summary per file
File Description
.nanvix/nanvix.toml Updates Nanvix SDK version and image digest in the manifest.
.nanvix/nanvix.lock Updates the generated lockfile metadata and resolved artifacts to match the new SDK.

Review details

Tip

Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

  • Files reviewed: 1/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Low

@ppenna
ppenna merged commit c7cf503 into nanvix/v3.12.3 Jul 30, 2026
13 checks passed
@ppenna
ppenna deleted the automation/update-nanvix-version branch July 30, 2026 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants