Skip to content

[ci] E: Update Nanvix SDK - #331

Merged
ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v3.49.0from
automation/update-nanvix-version
Jul 29, 2026
Merged

[ci] E: Update Nanvix SDK#331
ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v3.49.0from
automation/update-nanvix-version

Conversation

@ppenna

@ppenna ppenna commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Automated coherent update to verified Nanvix SDK v0.21.51-sdk.1. The manifest and lockfile were generated atomically by the target zutils implementation.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 29, 2026 11:59

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the Nanvix SDK pin used by this repository’s Nanvix build tooling, keeping the manifest and lockfile in sync with the newly verified SDK release.

Changes:

  • Bumps nanvix-version from 0.21.49 to 0.21.51 in the Nanvix manifest.
  • Updates the pinned Nanvix SDK (v0.21.51-sdk.1) and corresponding image digest in both manifest and lockfile.
  • Refreshes lockfile metadata (manifest hash, resolved commits/tags, and asset URLs/IDs) to match the new SDK.
Show a summary per file
File Description
.nanvix/nanvix.toml Updates Nanvix version / SDK version and container digest pins.
.nanvix/nanvix.lock Regenerates lock metadata to reflect the new SDK, toolchain, sysroot, and dependency resolution.

Review details

Tip

Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

  • Files reviewed: 1/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Low

@ppenna
ppenna merged commit a998e49 into nanvix/v3.49.0 Jul 29, 2026
13 checks passed
@ppenna
ppenna deleted the automation/update-nanvix-version branch July 29, 2026 12:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants