AGENT-1493: Promote NoRegistryClusterInstall Feature to Default - #2859
AGENT-1493: Promote NoRegistryClusterInstall Feature to Default#2859sadasu wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
@sadasu: This pull request references AGENT-1394 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target only the "5.0.0" version, but multiple target versions were set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR enables Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: Important Pre-merge checks failedPlease resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional. ❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 2 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (12 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: LGTM mode |
|
Hello @sadasu! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api: |
|
@sadasu: This pull request references AGENT-1493 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@sadasu: This pull request references AGENT-1493 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
| api-approved.openshift.io: https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/2510 | ||
| api.openshift.io/merged-by-featuregates: "true" | ||
| include.release.openshift.io/self-managed-high-availability: "true" | ||
| release.openshift.io/feature-set: CustomNoUpgrade,DevPreviewNoUpgrade,TechPreviewNoUpgrade |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like the IRI object itself is still v1alpha1 only: https://github.com/openshift/api/blob/master/machineconfiguration/v1alpha1/types_internalreleaseimage.go ?
We don't allow GA'ing with a alpha API. We would need to graduate the API to v1 first, before we graduate the dependent feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we require a separate PR for that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@andfasano Yes, lets create a separate PR for that.
|
Requires #2863 |
e5c1c9a to
230642e
Compare
|
Do we have any specific periodic tests that demonstrate this feature behaving as described? |
Yes, we added four different TP periodic jobs to cover all the supported platform type/network/topology combinations, here: https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/jobs/5.0?filters=%257B%2522items%2522%253A%255B%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522variants%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522has%2520entry%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522never-stable%2522%252C%2522not%2522%253Atrue%257D%252C%257B%2522id%2522%253A99%252C%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522name%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522contains%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522iso-no-registry%2522%257D%255D%257D&sort=asc&sortField=net_improvement. Please note that the latest PR for bumping the IRI api to v1 successfully landed on Friday, but we didn't yet get a freshly updated green 5.0 nightly payload, thus the current stripe of failures. |
|
Could we please add a mapping that maps the |
Recently we did some work with TRT to add the mapping in Sippy CR openshift-eng/ci-test-mapping#767. We've been able also to start gathering some data from the aforementioned jobs, this view seems to work right now |
|
Functionally speaking the code is fine. I think this is ready for merge once feature-promotion is green |
|
/test verify-feature-promotion
|
|
/test verify-feature-promotion |
|
It looks like at least now the tests are fetched |
|
The fix for the single failing test openshift/origin#31394 landed and it was included in https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/5.0.0-0.nightly/release/5.0.0-0.nightly-2026-07-17-034502, so the trend should improve from the next green nightly (they are still red). The latest two runs per job installed and verified the cluster correctly, they just failed as per #31394 |
|
/test verify-feature-promotion |
|
PR-Agent: could not find a component named |
|
/test verify-feature-promotion |
|
PR-Agent: could not find a component named |
|
/test verify-feature-promotion |
|
PR-Agent: could not find a component named |
|
/test verify-feature-promotion |
|
PR-Agent: could not find a component named |
|
@JoelSpeed @everettraven do you think we could be ready for approving the feature? After the nightlies have been stabilized we collected a solid stripe of green runs across all the OVE jobs in Sippy - and even before most of the failure were mostly technical and not strictly related to the feature. Thanks |
|
@andfasano I am working on the rebase and removing the changes to feature promotion code. |
fd7e0ed to
3466f3e
Compare
Feature NoRegistryClusterInstall is ready to be supported during Agent installs by default.
3466f3e to
1cabfcf
Compare
|
/verified by CI |
|
@sadasu: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Further analysis of the job results combined with improvements in #2944 shows strong signal that this feature is stable and ready to be promoted. Hypershift failure is a known rebase issue. /lgtm /override ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion |
|
@everettraven: Overrode contexts on behalf of everettraven: ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion, ci/prow/verify-hypershift-integration DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Scheduling tests matching the |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: everettraven The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest-required |
1 similar comment
|
/retest-required |
|
@sadasu: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/retest-required |
Feature NoRegistryClusterInstall is ready to be supported during Agent installs by default.