feat(skills): add process-impact playbook for change justification - #648
Open
adriannoes wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
feat(skills): add process-impact playbook for change justification#648adriannoes wants to merge 2 commits into
adriannoes wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Agents can quantify time returned on a material process change from context they already have. Design and intelligence emit a short impact line; a pipe diagnosis runs only when asked. Signed-off-by: Adrianno Esnarriaga <esadrianno@gmail.com>
Diagnosis reuses intelligence round 1 only. Card samples are not weekly volume, phase cards_count is WIP not lead time, and get_ai_agents takes the pipe UUID. Word-boundary FTE so "after" is not a false positive. Signed-off-by: Adrianno Esnarriaga <esadrianno@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
pipefy-process-impactso agents can quantify whether a process change is worth it from context already in the conversation, without implementing it.get_ai_agentstakes the pipe UUID;cards_countis WIP, not lead time; a card sample is not weekly volume.Test plan
uv run python .github/workflows/scripts/lint_skill_refs.py(Wave 0: passed, 18 files)uv run pytest tests/test_process_impact_skill_catalog.py(Wave 0: 4 passed)uv run pytest -m "not integration"uv run ruff check . && uv run ruff format --check .get_ai_agents)Routing scenarios
HIT (load this skill):
MISS (do not load this skill):
Live traps (QA Analytics pipe)
get_ai_agentsreturnsPERMISSION_DENIED. Resolvepipe.uuidviaget_pipefirst, thenget_ai_agents repo_uuid=<pipe.uuid>.phases[].cards_countis live WIP / bottleneck inventory, not lead time.cases_per_week.Docs / skills
docs/parity.mdupdated when MCP ↔ CLI coverage changedskills/updated in this PR (or a paired PR)Catalog and plugin wiring land with the skill:
skills/README.md,skills/AGENTS.mddomain list,CHANGELOG.mdUnreleased,.cursor-plugin/plugin.json. No MCP/CLI tools added, so parity is unchanged. RootREADME.mdanddocs/keep pointing at the skills catalog rather than listing each skill.Legal / contributions
git commit -s)COMPLIANCE.mdwhen applicable