Skip to content

Drop foundry.toml release metadata: version intent lives in next-v tags (rainix#335) - #54

Merged
thedavidmeister merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
2026-08-19-drop-release-metadata
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

Drop foundry.toml release metadata: version intent lives in next-v tags (rainix#335)#54
thedavidmeister merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
2026-08-19-drop-release-metadata

Conversation

@thedavidmeister

@thedavidmeister thedavidmeister commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Deletes the legacy [package] release-metadata section (name/version) from foundry.toml, per the ruling in rainlanguage/rainix#335. Since rainlanguage/rainix#336 merged, rainix-autopublish derives the publish version from the Soldeer registry plus next-v* git tags and never reads this section; the publish gate also excludes the section from the content hash, so this deletion is content-neutral and cannot mint a release.

QA

  • Discriminating tests: n/a - config-metadata deletion; nothing reads the section since rainix#336. Verified locally: nix develop -c reuse lint, nix develop -c forge soldeer install, and nix develop -c forge build green. This repo has no test/ directory, so the build is the full local check; CI runs its own pipeline.
  • Mutations applied: n/a - no code changed
  • Oracle: rainix#336 gate semantics (section excluded from content hash; version from registry + next-v tags)
  • Category check: issue asks removal of release metadata from consumers; covered exactly for this repo

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed package name and version metadata from the project configuration.
    • All compiler, testing, dependency, and build settings remain unchanged.

…gs (rainix#335)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@thedavidmeister thedavidmeister self-assigned this Aug 19, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@thedavidmeister, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 9 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

Wait for the limit to reset, then comment @coderabbitai review or push new commits to the PR.

An organization admin can change what happens after included review limits in Billing.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization.

For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d6e5032c-fc22-4a06-ad05-d222af1a0ba6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 34ad4fa and 067f91e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CLAUDE.md

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 619f045d-015b-4158-8e66-dd0ebb541c19

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b6adb9 and 34ad4fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • foundry.toml
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • foundry.toml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.


Walkthrough

The change removes the [package] section from foundry.toml, including the project name and version. Other Foundry configuration remains unchanged.

Changes

Foundry configuration

Layer / File(s) Summary
Remove package metadata
foundry.toml
Removes the rain-factory package name and 0.1.7 version declarations.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 34ad4

This localized configuration cleanup removes obsolete release metadata without changing application behavior; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the removal of release metadata from foundry.toml and the use of next-v tags for version intent.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch 2026-08-19-drop-release-metadata

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

…elease docs

The rainix-sol static gate now enforces a 4096-byte agent-context budget;
CLAUDE.md was 4492. Condensed the build/deploy boilerplate and rewrote the
Releases section to the post-rainix#336 flow (registry-derived version + next-v
tags, no foundry.toml release metadata, no commit-back).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@thedavidmeister
thedavidmeister merged commit 193dbb9 into main Aug 19, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant