Use current codesign certificate extraction syntax - #27
Merged
Conversation
s1korrrr
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2026
Co-authored-by: Rafal Sikora <24563931+s1korrrr@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
--extract-certificates=<prefix>syntaxProduction reproduction
The exact-tag build signed and strictly verified the DMG, but current
codesigninterpreted the separated prefix as another artifact path and produced no certificate files. The equals form extracts the full chain successfully from both the DMG and app.Verification
bash Packaging/DeveloperID/tests/notarize_release_contract_test.shPackaging/DeveloperID/tests/run_tests.shNo dedicated security scan was run, per owner instruction.