Skip to content

repo-stats: retry on non-standard HTTP 499 too - #3514

Merged
GuillaumeGomez merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
syphar:repo-http-499
Sep 14, 2026
Merged

GuillaumeGomez merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
syphar:repo-http-499

Conversation

@syphar

@syphar syphar commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

in sentry we see http 499 coming from github:

GitHub GraphQL response status: 499 <unknown status code>

Some research implies it's transient (to me).

We could also have some shared retry policy where other parts of the codebase (registry-api) would also know how to handle the status 499, but for now I'll leave it just here, where I actually saw it.

@syphar syphar self-assigned this Sep 12, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: This pull request has been implemented and needs to be reviewed label Sep 12, 2026
@syphar
syphar marked this pull request as ready for review September 12, 2026 05:02
@syphar
syphar requested a review from a team as a code owner September 12, 2026 05:02
@syphar

This comment was marked as outdated.

@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot

rustbot commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

@syphar

This comment was marked as outdated.

@syphar

syphar commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

r? @GuillaumeGomez

@rustbot rustbot assigned GuillaumeGomez and unassigned syphar Sep 12, 2026
@GuillaumeGomez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

That one was quick to review. Weird that they have their own HTTP status code. "internet"

Anyway, thanks! =D

@GuillaumeGomez
GuillaumeGomez merged commit e0f4ed3 into rust-lang:main Sep 14, 2026
14 of 15 checks passed
@GuillaumeGomez
GuillaumeGomez deleted the repo-http-499 branch September 14, 2026 11:40
@github-actions github-actions Bot added S-waiting-on-deploy This PR is ready to be merged, but is waiting for an admin to have time to deploy it and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: This pull request has been implemented and needs to be reviewed labels Sep 14, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Sep 14, 2026
@syphar syphar removed the S-waiting-on-deploy This PR is ready to be merged, but is waiting for an admin to have time to deploy it label Sep 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants