Skip to content

Give the Rustup team access to rustup-components-history - #2758

Merged
ubiratansoares merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
Kobzol:rustup-components-history
Sep 16, 2026
Merged

ubiratansoares merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
Kobzol:rustup-components-history

Conversation

@Kobzol

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Suggested here.

Since the repo has a lot to do with Rustup, I think that the team should have access.

CC @rust-lang/rustup

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Dry-run check results

[WARN  rust_team::sync] sync-team is running in dry mode, no changes will be applied.
[INFO  rust_team::sync] synchronizing crates-io
[INFO  rust_team::sync] synchronizing github
[INFO  rust_team::sync] 💻 Repo Diffs:
    📝 Editing repo 'rust-lang/rustup-components-history':
      Permission Changes:
        Giving team 'rustup' write permission
      Rulesets:
          Creating 'main'
            Include Branches: ["refs/heads/main"]
            Required approvals: 0
            Required status checks: build (integration_id: 15368)
      Pages:
        🔄 Update:
            Old: legacy branch=gh-pages path=/
            New: workflow

@ubiratansoares

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Kobzol should we make the most of this PR and eventually add simple branch protection for this repo?

@Kobzol

Kobzol commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Yeah, good point, I was thinking the same. While at it, I also switched GH pages to the modern workflow mechanism, I will switch the GH pages workflow to use it.

@ubiratansoares
ubiratansoares added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 16, 2026
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:main with commit 6393b51 Sep 16, 2026
5 checks passed
@Kobzol
Kobzol deleted the rustup-components-history branch September 16, 2026 18:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants