Skip to content

Fix fan-dipole coupling (parallel legs) and the segment-length validation false alarm - #14

Merged
skip17331 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fan-coupling
Jun 3, 2026
Merged

Fix fan-dipole coupling (parallel legs) and the segment-length validation false alarm#14
skip17331 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fan-coupling

Conversation

@skip17331

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Addresses the three fan-dipole issues reported after the last round.

1. Coupling / outrageous SWR (the core fix)

The fan fanned its legs out from a single ~10 cm feed gap, so the legs converged to near-zero separation exactly at the high-current feedpoint — where coupling is strongest. A leg that's a harmonic on another's band (the 80 m leg is a full-wave on 40 m; the 40 m on 20 m) then swamped the resonant leg:

80/40/15/10 fan, 40 m leg:  Z = 2.5 − 219j,  SWR ≈ 405   (before)

Rebuilt as a true parallel manifold: the legs run parallel, a fixed end_spacing apart; a left and right bus carry each leg's two halves back to a short central feed bridge, so the separation is constant the whole length — including at the feed. The end-spacing knob now genuinely controls coupling.

                      before → after  (default 0.3 m spacing)
80/40/15/10  40 m:    405   → 14
40/20/15/10  20 m:    38    → 10

Octave-related legs (40&20, 80&40) still need per-leg length trimming — that's real physics (a full-wave leg on another's band), and the per-band tuning chart from the previous PR is exactly for it. The change takes it from catastrophic to workable + trim. Because parallel legs aren't length-bounded in their offset, the old "spacing too large for the shortest leg" limit is removed.

2. Validation false alarm on Run

The "a wire segment is shorter than a … wavelength" toast was the segment-length check judging the short legs and feed bridge against the long design wavelength. A fan dipole's legs are auto-segmented for their own bands, and the feed bridge/buses are intentional short structural wires (standard NEC technique), so the check is now skipped for a fan dipole.

3. "Bands covered" outrageous SWR

Same root cause as #1 — the per-leg report now reflects the far better parallel-geometry numbers.

Tests

Updated for the parallel geometry (deck structure, parallel legs at constant Y, end-spacing); added guards that the octave-leg SWR stays workable (< 30, was ~405) and that no short-segment alarm fires for a fan dipole. Suite 530 → 532, green locally.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

… alarm

The fan dipole fanned its legs out from one tiny feed gap, so the legs
converged to near-zero separation exactly at the high-current feedpoint —
maximising the coupling that detunes them. A leg that is a harmonic on
another's band (the 80 m leg is a full-wave on 40 m, the 40 m on 20 m) then
swamped the resonant leg: the 40 m leg in an 80/40 fan read SWR ~405.

Rebuild the geometry as a true parallel manifold: the legs run parallel a
fixed end_spacing apart, a left and right bus carry each leg's halves back to
a short central feed bridge, so the spacing is constant the whole length —
including at the feed. The end spacing now genuinely controls coupling. On an
80/40/15/10 fan the 40 m leg drops from ~405 to ~14, and a 40/20/15/10 fan's
20 m leg from ~38 to ~10 (octave legs still need per-leg trimming — that is
physics, and the per-band tuning chart is for it). Because the legs are
parallel, an end offset is no longer bounded by leg length, so the old
"too large for the shortest leg" limit is gone.

Also fix the validation false alarm the user hit on Run: the segment-length
check judged the short legs and feed bridge against the long design
wavelength. A fan dipole's legs are auto-segmented for their own bands and its
feed bridge/buses are intentional short structural wires, so the check is
skipped for a fan dipole.

Tests updated for the parallel geometry; added guards that the octave-leg SWR
stays workable and that no short-segment alarm fires. Suite 530 -> 532.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@skip17331
skip17331 merged commit 87d5fed into main Jun 3, 2026
6 checks passed
@skip17331
skip17331 deleted the fan-coupling branch June 3, 2026 16:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant