Conversation
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey, I was reviewing the project with my rust static analyzer(security/ub), I usually use an agent to help me review the findings and this time I received a false negative report which is not in-scope of my analyzer but I think needs to be fixed.
I verified the report against python datetime and coreutils date and it is valid, parsing sunday based week number is invalid in most years by six days when jan 1 falls on a monday.
there was not a single static analyzer TP(except a documented panic), which is interesting because I haven't seen that in any other project, high quality code-base, congratulations.